What do you do when "global warming" turns into global cooling? How does a "scientist" handle data that does not support his theory? What's a "scientist" to do when he cannot prove man-made global warming after millions of dollars and many years trying? What do you do when 31,000 real scientists completely refute your contention of man-made global warming? What happens when your computer-generated models turn out to be 180 degrees out of synch?
If you are a global warming "scientist," you do several things: Hide all conflicting data, erase or destroy data that doesn't support your agenda, suppress any and all dissent from skeptics, tell everyone "the argument is over," change your vocabulary from "global warming" to "climate change" and try your best not to let the real data come out.
Sadly, this is exactly what has happened in the persistent and continuing hoax called man-made global warming. In a series of leaked, and damning e-mails, the truth about the "scientists" who push this agenda has finally been made public.
In a nutshell, a small number of alarmists who call themselves "scientists" have been manipulating and destroying data for years in a vain attempt to prove man-made global warming. This fraud has penetrated our children's textbooks, with frightening and dire scenarios of coastal flooding, extinction of man, and of course the poor, poor, polar bear.
Never mind the fact that there are far more polar bears now than 30-40 years ago and their numbers are increasing. Or, that the Earth has been cooling for the last 11 years in the face of continued man-made C02. Or, that the Vostok ice core data proves that increases in C02 follows warming periods, not the other way around.
C02 is neither a pollutant, nor a significant greenhouse gas. In fact, C02 is vital to life on Earth. Wonder how cold it has to get to change a few minds?
By David Palmer