Prior
posts have shown intuitive
examples that the theory of back radiation from greenhouse gases causing warming is fictitious, that
NASA's Earth energy budget does not include back radiation at all (in stark contrast to the IPCC which shows it to be unidirectional and 95% of the solar input), and that
at least 28 other analyses of the physics agree that back radiation can not cause additional increase in global temperature. The IPCC Earth energy budget was created by Kevin Trenberth, author of the climategate email stating "The fact is we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't". Most likely, the reason the Trenberth/IPCC Earth energy budget can't account for the lack of warming is because warming from greenhouse gas back radiation doesn't exist.
Claes Johnson, professor of applied mathematics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, has a
blog for those interested in the mathematics & physics of the atmosphere, and has a
new post today which also finds the conventional greenhouse gas theory of back radiation or reradiation causing global warming to be fictitious:
AGW Myth of Reradiation:
Click source to read FULL report
1%
13%
86%
Tweet Article
Post to Facebook
Print Article