The validity of the manmade global warming alarm requires the support of scientific forecasts of:
(1) a substantive long-term rise in global mean temperatures in the absence of regulations,
(2) serious net harmful effects due to global warming, and
(3) cost-effective regulations that would produce net beneficial effects versus alternatives such as doing nothing.
Without scientific forecasts for all three aspects of the alarm, there is no scientific basis to enact regulations. In effect, it is a three-legged stool.
Despite repeated appeals to global warming alarmists, we have been unable to find scientific forecasts for any of the three legs.
to download PDF file and read FULL report by Professor J. Scott Armstrong from SPPI