Wednesday, February 15th 2012, 3:33 PM EST
After sending off the unverified hypothesis issue I downloaded Andrew Montford's report The Royal Society on climate change published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (TheGWPF.org). It was very disturbing. An important issue that is missing from the report is what motivated these leaders to descend to these uncivilised tactics. There must have been a reason.
Whatever the reason, the consequences are that the image of the once esteemed Royal Society has suffered a severe blow. I wonder if the society ever considered the consequences that their own unfounded recommendations would have on the less affluent nations of the world, particularly those in Africa.
I strongly recommend that you read the report within the context of the attached Memo 04/12.
PS I substantiate my position in my comprehensive technical report titled Climate change and its consequences -- an African perspective distributed in 2007. It has 11 chapters (337 pages); eight appendices (216 pages) and seven PowerPoint presentations (452 slides).
I will provide the website address in my next memo. I would welcome an impartial evaluation of this report by an independent scientific body.
Does such a body exist in the UK?
Memo 04.12 The tuth.pdf