View Article

view the latest news articles
Letter: Rupert Wyndham: Complaints Framework Consultation submission March 2012
Wednesday, April 4th 2012, 6:09 AM EDT
Co2sceptic (Site Admin)
Mr. John Hamer
BBC Trust Unit
180 Great Portland Street
London
W1W 5QZ

Dear Mr. Hamer

BBC – Complaints Framework Consultation submission March 2012

Your email dated 8 March 2012 refers. Its receipt is a blessing flowing, I presume, from the stimulating exchanges between us over the course of the last some years.

I have, indeed, had numerous encounters with the current Complaints Procedure of the BBC almost, but not quite, all in connection with coverage of so-termed climate change. All, without exception, have been unsatisfactory and for precisely the same reason, namely the pursuit by the BBC of a partisan agenda not merely without benefit of evidence but, on the contrary, in the face of copious multi-stranded contra-indications. I will focus primarily on the climate change issue, but will touch upon others before completion of this submission, for they too are of importance in connection with the

a. BBC’s respect for its own published Editorial Standards;
b. BBC’s proposed revisions to its Complaints Framework.
In any event, I respond now to the BBC’s invitation to make a submission even though I do not have any confidence that it will have the slightest influence on minds set firmly upon the pursuit of a cultist ideology, and are cavalier about the means deployed to proselytise it. Rather, I expect to do little more than pre-empt any possible future assertion that such an invitation was extended and was pointedly repudiated. In doing so, I make no apology if the submission turns out to be as long as it needs to be. In the course of it, I do not propose to resurrect the past, however. Reference to scientific issues will be for illustrative purposes only.

In response, it would appear, to the unceasing flood of similar complaints from licence fee payers, the BBC has from time to time issued statements, which have intimated a change of direction in its treatment of authentic science which runs counter to its projected orthodoxy. Any change for the better in its stance has yet to materialise. Rather, confronted with empirical evidence, it has preferred instead casuistry, dissembling, misrepresentation and dismissive disregard as its dialectical weapons of choice. It has gone further. In its efforts to construct a moat around an intellectual house of cards, it has resorted (sunk?) to the level of commissioning an apologist paper from a supposedly independent expert. And the identity of this oracle? A climate scientist, maybe? No? A physicist? No? A chemist? No? Not even a botanist? No. There was anointed instead a geneticist, the world’s greatest authority no less, on anti-clockwise spiralling snails. The BBC might have selected a lepidopterist, maybe. Why not? Or, a bacteriologist or a virologist? But no; it preferred to appoint a biologist infatuated with gastropods - something illuminating in that, maybe. Well, well!

And his recommendation - no doubt, pre-ordained? Why, of course, to afford even less air time to so-called deniers, an epithet evidently intended to embody an offensive nuance. One may point out, of course, that ‘even less’ of almost nothing remains almost nothing. One also notes, with interest, the BBC’s reference in its briefing papers to gratuitously abusive or offensive language. Moreover, did the implicitly anti-scientific character of his recommendation also escape the BBC? Probably not, but it was most surely ostentatiously ignored.

Before departing entirely from this paragon of scientific transparency and rigour, however, it might just be worth a quotation from his voluminous writings. “Science,” he has proclaimed “is a broad church, full of narrow minds trained to know ever more about even less.” Well, there can be not much arguing with that now, can there?

It is equally inescapable that the BBC has seen no cognitive dissonance between its commissioning of a lick spittle report from a non-specialist and, at other times, its espousal of the cultist line that, as a discipline, climate change was/is of such a specialised and complex character that only ‘climate scientists’ were/are in a position to express a view. In itself arrogant and obnoxious, the obvious point that this proposition lends itself, above all, to dictatorial monopoly conveniently escapes it. But then, of course, neither has it ever seemed telling or strange to the BBC that climatologists and other practitioners of vast experience and achievement from across the world have roundly condemned climate change alarmism as plainly fraudulent. For the BBC, the scathing and well supported critiques of the IPCC are equally to be ignored.

Instead, what is trotted out has been the ever constant repetition of the mendacious refrain that there is ‘an overwhelming consensus’ of scientists who support the orthodoxy. Leaving aside the inherent irrelevance of this line of argument, the BBC has in parallel consistently refused to acknowledge what is equally self-evident, namely that, if substantial numbers of experts on a controversial topic do not subscribe to an alleged consensual paradigm then, by definition, it is not a consensus nor, indeed, is it a paradigm! But then, in the Corporation’s handling of this controversy logic, like integrity, has never been conspicuous and beyond challenge. This, no doubt, serves to explain the ever rising tide of excoriation to which, day after day, the BBC finds itself subjected - not simply from a few diehard malcontents but from great swathes of what should be its natural allies from within the print media, specifically from within the scientific community itself (thankfully) as well as from within the legions of the public at large.

The mere fact of initiating a time consuming and expensive consultation with regard to the BBC’s Complaints Framework immediately and necessarily begs the question “Why?” The consultation documentation points to organisational issues that need to be addressed in the interests of efficiency. In these, I have little interest. The mechanics of complaints handling are managerial issues. It should be axiomatic that they be easily understood and should be timely in execution. The fact that, hitherto, they have been neither constitutes a serious criticism for any organisation funded out of what is effectively a poll tax. The reference to timeliness is particularly obnoxious. I have personally been aware of complaints that have taken months, and in one case over a year, to receive a response. At the same time, the BBC has sought to place severe time constraints on complainants. This speaks not merely to lack of efficiency but also to hypocrisy and absence of honest intent.

And therein, of course, lies the bedrock criterion for assessing the worth and usefulness of any complaints procedure - whether existing now or, in future, to be altered. For decades the reputation of the BBC rested on a universally held perception that it was impartial in its coverage both of news and of other factually based programming. This did not mean that there was necessarily any sort of unanimity or consensus in accepting the veracity of what was broadcast. By and large, though, it was accepted that output on matters of controversy was more or less even handed. There were always minorities or special interest groups who charged the BBC with inclining either too much to the left or too much to the right. The response of the BBC, which I have heard many times, was “If we’re offending both the left and the right, then we’re probably getting it about right.” That constituted a robust and healthy detachment.

In stark contrast, what we have now acquired is impartiality that has had to be ‘calibrated’, to use the BBC’s own sophism. This linguistic sleight of hand, however, is precisely that - a wilfully cynical distortion of the ordinary, accepted meaning of language. We all know what impartiality means, and so does the BBC. Synonyms might encompass such alternatives as ‘even handedness’, ‘fairness’, ‘probity’, ‘disinterestedness’, ‘equality’, ‘neutrality’. In short, impartiality is an absolute. It cannot be ‘calibrated’ any more than can uniqueness. The suggestion that it can be is a conceptual absurdity, an ethical affront.

But to charges of systemic bias, it has been and is precisely to this that the BBC has had recourse - most particularly, of course, in relation to what has been declared by it, amongst others, to be the greatest challenge confronting the species in the 20th/21st centuries. This, naturally, is a reference to putative climate change wrought by human emissions of a benign trace gas. This atmospheric component, however, happens also to be the sine qua non of all life on the planet. It constitutes, moreover, a substance which every human, as well as every other higher life form, exhales with each breath that it takes. And yet this the global warming propagandists, both within and without the BBC, affirm is a pollutant with the capacity to trigger climatic catastrophe.

It matters not a jot that there exists not one iota of observational evidence to support what common sense alone dictates must be a prima facie improbability. To the BBC it matters not a jot that physicists, as well as practitioners across the spectrum of scientific disciplines but, over and over again, men and women of authentic stature in their respective fields, completely dismiss such alarmist exaggeration - as, indeed, did the IPCC before last minute unilateral changes to its 1995 conclusions were secretly engineered by a certain Dr. Ben Santer, albeit with the connivance and authority of those conspicuous exemplars of detached observation and scientific probity, Messrs. Bolin and Houghton. To the BBC and its fellow cult propagandists it matters nothing that the geological record discloses CO2 concentrations far beyond prevailing levels, and those during prolonged periods - meaning, let’s be clear in this context, millennia not months - of global glaciation. For the BBC, though, all references to possible contra-indications to the adopted orthodoxy are to be strenuously avoided or, if needs must, are to be treated with ridicule or misrepresentation.

But, having plumbed these relatively shallow reaches of chicanery, does it stop there? To be sure, it does not. No, for this paragon of journalistic rectitude, there are always fresh and greater depths of duplicity to be explored. Thus, we find reports being altered in response to pressure from card carrying environmentalist cadres. We find entire stories, in this case the greatest scandal to rock the entire pseudo-scientific global warming charade, being surreptitiously buried by Corporation journalists. In that case, of course, the scandal eventually broke, but not before so-called BBC environmental staff had sat on it for over a month. Overall, in fact, does not the record of the BBC invite colourable comparison to the coverage of its own recent history by the Chinese Communist Party? Something unpalatable in the woodshed? Nulla problema – simply dust off the air brush!

And what is the BBC’s justification for this plain and clear subversion of its editorial requirement to be impartial? Why, to be sure, none other than a clandestine meeting of senior decision makers - amongst them a name currently being touted as a possible (likely?) next Director General - with a former President of the Royal Society and a motley assembly of ‘green’ activists, a meeting the nature of which the BBC has strenuously sought to keep secret, and continues so to do. Why? Well, unlikely though it may be, perhaps one day the BBC will disclose the reason to its licence fee payers. Whatever it may be, however, will surely not be to its credit.

In the meantime, it is fair to record, is it not, that the venerable Society of which Mr. May was President has also come under fierce attack from scores within its own ranks, all of whom, one presumes, the BBC would acknowledge to be distinguished scientists. But any report of this from the BBC? I do not recall but, if there was, one may be sure that it was an ‘inside page’ item in a much reduced font size. Instead from the present encumbent, we are regaled in a recent BBC documentary with such intellectual gems as “If you had a heart condition, would you visit a dentist?” Well, in case Mr. Nurse doesn’t know the answer, it is “No, but I sure as heck would want a second opinion.”

But, once again, it does not stop there does it? Having persistently breached the requirement to be impartial, it follows almost ineluctably that that it will also have persistently breached its obligation to be accurate. And, having been wilfully and persistently inaccurate (not to mention outright mendacious), this raises the gravest danger that it will also have been repeatedly in breach of a third of its Editorial Standards, namely that requiring news/factual documentary coverage to avoid promoting the personal opinions of individual reporters.

And, in this, we may briefly step outside the confines of single topic narration. In its overseas coverage, in particular, when interviewing certain foreign spokesmen, BBC journalists have repeatedly resorted to the use of tendentious questioning, instantaneously followed by opprobrious interruption when responses were not as pre-scripted in the mind of the reporter in question. An interview with the Sri Lankan defence minister in relation to alleged war crimes in one instance and with an Israeli government spokesman on the issue of Palestinian rights in another are well recollected. The fabrication of a prejudged outcome by a BBC journalist is of no interest to any fair minded recipient of his/her storyline.

I have mentioned two examples of reports personally witnessed as a listener, but why should I go on? I am sure that the BBC is as aware as am I that, so all pervasive is the perception of systemic bias within the Corporation, that an entire website now exists to track and record further examples of what I have alleged. In short, “J’accuse” - but then so do senior members and former members of its own staff! And the response of the BBC? Why, nothing less than to continue to assert its corporate pride in its own manifest impartiality! But, of course! Why not, to be sure? How could it be otherwise?

Allow me to add that there is little doubt that the BBC regards its licence fee payers as contemptible. It should not make the parallel mistake of assuming that they are all deranged.

In conclusion then, this is allegedly a consultation about the establishment of a revised Complaints Framework. The framework as such is not of central importance. The crucial issue lies in whether or not the BBC proposes to act in good faith with honesty of purpose or, in the alternative, has its course set upon the continued pursuit of a pre-determined and perverse (indeed, perverted) agenda - which is what, speaking personally, I suspect. That pre-determined agenda is most conspicuously exemplified by coverage of the climate change controversy but, as has been indicated, is by no means confined to it. Systemic bias is evident across the entire spectrum of its journalistic activities. Its unquestioned and, to its collectivist mindset, unquestionable assumptions inform every facet of its supposedly factual programming, and thereby render adherence to its own Editorial Standards all but an exercise in futility.

This is not an issue about the veracity or otherwise of any particular scientific hypothesis or political positioning. It is about the BBC’s handling of matters of moment and, following therefrom, about its handling of complaints relating to what are regarded as lapses from its own self declared aspiration to objectivity. In that, it is an ethical issue of singular significance, most particularly in relation to a body which owes its existence to public funding from across the population at large and not merely from sectional interests. Andrew Marr expresses it well enough:

"The BBC is not impartial or neutral. It's a publicly funded, urban organisation with an abnormally large number of young people, ethnic minorities and gay people. It has a liberal bias not so much a party-political bias. It is better expressed as a cultural liberal bias",……………”

Of course, whether the population at large has ‘a cultural liberal bias’ is, I submit, highly debateable. In any event, the Editorial Standards of the BBC mandate that it provides an even handed reflection of what is actual reality, not what its liberal leaning consensus considers such reality ought to be.

The Complaints Framework is integral to that objective.

Yours sincerely


Rupert Wyndham

Cc: As the spirit moves

PS On Saturday, I received a letter from your colleague, Philip Boyce. It related to a letter I had written on 12 October last year. Jolly impressive!

Show #11-20

Current Poll
» How much "Man Made" CO2 Is In The Earth's Atmosphere?
  • I think ALL of the CO2 in the Earth's Atmosphere is from man.
    graph bar 0 1%
  • I'm not sure how much "Man Made" CO2 is in the Earth's Atmosphere.
    graph bar 1 13%
  • There is .04% CO2 in the Earth's Atmosphere and of that "Man" has added an extra 4% (1 part in 62,500)
    graph bar 2 86%

you have already voted

Articles by Climate Realists and Topics

» Recently used highlighted

ALL #-E F-J K-O P-T U-Z
10:10 No Pressure
2010 Forecast
2011 Forecast
2012 Forecast
2012 USA Election
2013 Forecast
24 Hours of Reality
28Gate
A Chart to Debunk AGW
A Graph to Debunk AGW
A Moment Of Clarity
Acidic Oceans
Adam Yoshida
Adrian MacNair
Adrian Sach (Donation)
Advert
AfricaGate
African Drought
Ahmed Boucenna
Al Ritter
Alan Broone
Alan Carlin
Alan Caruba
Alan Cochrane
Alan Jones
Alan Moran
Alan Nicholl
Alan Siddons
Alan Smith (Donation)
Alan Tenczar (Donation)
Alan Tichmarsh
Alberta Election 2012
Alberto Miatello
Alec Evans (Donation)
Alec Pearson (Donation)
Alex Epstein
Alex Jones
Alex Newman
Allan Macrae
Allen Quist
Alok Mukherjee
Amanda Baillieu
Amazon Rain Forests
AmazonGate
American Meteorological Society
Amy Ridenour
An Inconvenient Truth
Andre Bijkerk
Andrew Bevan (Donation)
Andrew Bolt
Andrew Duncan (Donation)
Andrew J. Hoffman
Andrew Kenny
Andrew McKillop
Andrew Montford
Andrew Neil
Andrew Orlowski
Ann McElhinney
Ann Widdecombe
Anna Sanclement
Anthony Bright-Paul
Anthony Cox
Anthony G. Martin
Anthony J. Sadar
Anthony Watts
Anton Evseyev
Anton Yevseev
Antonio Mario Lorusso (Donation)
Arcady Tishkov
ArcticSnap.Com
Arno Arrak
Art Horn
Arthur Rorsch
Arthur Wiegenfeld
Arvid Pasto
Astrophysics v Meteorology
AtlasGate
Aubrey Vaughan
Audio
Augusto Mangini
Barrington Davey (Donation)
Barry Brill
Barry Cooper
Barry Napier
Barry Schwartz
Barry Woods
Barun S. Mitra
BBC
BBC Review
Ben Fordham
Ben Pile
Benny Peiser
Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (BEST) Project
Berthold Klein
Betting
Beverly K. Eakman
Bill Board
Bill DiPuccio
Bill Frezza
Bill McKibben
Bill Stratton
Bjarne Andresen
Bjorn Lomborg
Blast From the Past
Bo Christiansen
Bob Ashworth
Bob Berman
Bob Carter
Bob Ellis
Bob Godfrey
Bob Lutz
Bob Tisdale
Bob Webster
Book
Boris Johnson
Brainwashing
Brendan O'Neill
Brent Bozell
Bret Stephens
Brian McNair
Brian Sussman
Brice Bosnich
Bring It On
Bruce Thompson
Bryan Fischer
Bryan Leyland
Burger King Sign
Buzz Aldrin
By Jove I Think They've Nearly Got It
C. R. de Freitas
Calem Smith
Cameron English
Campaign Against Climate Change
CampusReform.org
Carbon Trading
Carey Roberts
Carl Brehmer
Carrington 2012
Cartoon
Cathy Taibbi
Catlin Arctic Survey
Cause & Effect
Censorship
CERN
CFACT
Charles Anderson
Charles Booker (Donation)
Charles Memminger
Charles O'Connor (Donation)
Chip Knappenberger
Chris de Freitas
Chris Smith
Chriss W. Street
Christian Gerondeau
Christmas Donation
Christopher Booker
Christopher C. Horner
Christopher Chantrill
Christopher Essex
Christopher Jones (Donation)
Christopher Pearson
Chuck Rogér
Claes Johnson
Claude Allègre
Claude Sandroff
Cliff OLLIER
Climate Cognitive Dissonance
Climate Fools Day
Climate of Doubt
Climate Protest
Climate Reality Project
ClimateGate
ClimateRapidResponse.org
ClimateRealists.Com
climaterealists.org.nz
ClimateWiki.org
Climatic Research Unit
Clive James
Clouds
CO2 Experiment
CO2 Is Green
CO2 Level
CO2 Propaganda
Coldest Journey On Earth
Combustible
Comet C/2013 A1
Comment
Comment On Article
Conrad Black
conservation
CONVOY OF NO CONFIDENCE
COP18
Copenhagen Conference
Countryside Party
CowGate
Craig Idso
Craig Rucker
Crop Yield
Daily Quake
Dan Miller
Dan Pangburn
Daniel Compton
Daniel Croak (Donation)
Daniel Greenfield
Daniel Hannan
Daniel Henninger
Daniel M. Sweger
Danielle Smith
Daren Jonescu
Darren Pope
Darren Samuelsohn
Dave Clewlow (Donation)
Dave Dahl
Dave Epstein
Dave Hatter
David Appell
David Archibald
David Becker (Donation)
David Bellamy
David Bennett (Donation)
David Bredenkamp
David Brockless (Donation)
David Brook (Donation)
David Child
David Deming
David Dick
David E. Sumner
David Evans
David Garner (Donation)
David H. Douglass
David Hanna (Donation)
David Hathaway
David Henderson
David Howse (Donation)
David Icke
David Ivory
David Klenk (Donation)
David Lappi
David Legates
David Lungren
David R. Legates
David Rose
David Schnare
David Smith (Donation)
David Spady
David Spiegelhalter
David Whitehouse
Dean Grubbs
Death Threats
Debra J. Saunders
Delayed
Denis Ables
Denis Rancourt
Dennis Ambler
Dennis Boothby
Dennis Byrne
Dennis T. Avery
Derek Alker
Deroy Murdock
Des Moore
Dexter Wright
Diana Allan (Donation)
Dick Warburton
Dominic Lawson
Dominik Jung
Don Blankenship
Don Easterbrook
Don Parkes
Don Petersen
Don Pierce (Donation)
Don Surber
Donald Trump
Donald Williams (Donation)
Donna Laframboise
Doreen Alli Linder
Doug L. Hoffman
Doug Wyatt
Douglas Cohen
Douglas Cotton
Douglas J. Keenan
Duggan Flanakin
Duncan Davidson
E. Calvin Beisner
Earthquake Research
Earthquakes (>=7.5) 2012
Earthquakes (>=7.5) 2013
Earthquakes (>=7) 2012
Earthquakes (>=7) 2013
Ed Berry
Ed Caryl
Ed Hiserodt
Ed Hoskins
Ed West
Editorial
Education
Edward Barnes
Edward F Blick
Edward Lane
Edward Moran
Edward R. Long
Edward Wimberley
Edwin X Berry
Elisa Pardo
Elizabeth Auld (Donation)
Email
Emily Oster
Energy & Fuel
EnergyGate
Environmentalism
Erik Kempers (Donation)
Erik Wemple
Erl Happ
Ernst Georg Beck
Exclusive
F. Swemson
Facebook
FakeGate
Falling Birds
Fan Page
FAQ
Ferenc Miskolczi
Film & TV
Financial
Finis Gillespie (Donation)
Fire James Hansen
FloodGate
Floor Anthoni
Food
Forrest Mims III
Fortunato F Condo (Donation)
Forum
Frank Davis
Frank J. Tamel
Frank J. Tipler
Frank Lansner
Frank Sherosky
Fraser Nelson
Fred Dardick
Fred Singer
Frederick Forsyth
Freeman Dyson
Fritz Vahrenholt
Front Page News
Frozen Al Gore
Funding
Gai Lehn (Donation)
Garrett Bastardi
Garth Paltridge
Gary DeBois (Donation)
Gary Novak
Gary Sutton
Gary Thompson
Gary Williams (Donation)
Gavin Cooke
Gayam Walter (Donation)
Geert Groot Koerkamp
Geoff Sharp
Geoffrey Lean
Geoffrey Lehmann
Geoffrey Temple (Donation)
Geological Society of America (GSA)
George Carlin
George Christensen
George Gardner (Donation)
George Giles
George Jonas
George Kukla
George Pell
George Will
Gerald T. Westbrook
Gerald Traufetter
Gerald Warner
Geraldo Luis Lino
Gerhard Kramm
Gerhard Loebert
Gerrit van der Lingen
Giora Shaviv
Girma Orssengo
Glenn Beck
Glenn Czulada (Donation)
Glenn Schleed
Global Warming Meltdown
Global Warming or Global Governance?
Global Weirding
Godfrey Bloom
Gone Fishing
Google
Gordon J. Fulks
Graham Stringer
Grant R. Jeffrey
Green Bonds
Green Cars
Green Ideology
Green Religion
Green Tax
Green Tories
GreenViolence
Greenwashing
Greg Sullivan (Donation)
Gregg Thompson
Gregory Fegel
Gregory Young
Guillermo Gonzalez
GV Chilingar
Habibullo Abdussamatov
Haiti Earthquake
Hank Campbell
Hans H.J. Labohm
Hans Jelbring
Hans Kelp (Donation)
Hans Schreuder
Hans von Storch
Harold Ambler
Harold W. Lewis
Harrison Schmitt
Harry Binswanger
Harry Eagar
Harry Jackson
Harvey M. Sheldon
Headline Story
HeartlandGate
Heather Brown (Donation)
Heinz Lycklama
Henri Suyderhoud (Donation)
Henrik Svensmark
Henry Lamb
Henry Payne
Hide The Decline Video
Himalayan Glacier Data
Holly Martin (Donation)
Horst Borchert
Horst-Joachim Lüdecke
How About That!
How to Comment
Howard Bigham (Donation)
Howard Hayden
Howard Nemerov
Hurricane News
I Can Change Your Mind About Climate
Iain Murray
Ian Clark
Ian Drever (Donation)
Ian McEwan
Ian Plimer
Ian Ridpath (Donation)
Ian Wishart
Ice Chart
IceGate
Ileana Johnson Paugh
ImmunityGate
Important Announcement
Important Notice
Indur M. Goklany
International Climate Science Coalition
IPCC Fifth Assessment Report
IPCC Review
iPhone App
Irina Shlionskaya
Ivan Kenneally
Ivar Giaever
Ivo Vegter
J. D. Longstreet
J. Winston Porter
J.R. Dunn
Jack Dini
Jack Kelly
Jack Van Wingerden
James A. Marusek
James Delingpole
James E Steelman (Donation)
James Hawes (Donation)
James Heiser
James Inhofe
James Lewis
James Lovelock
James M. Taylor
James Macdonald
James Maropoulakis Denney
James R. Barrante
James Randi
James Rust
JAMES SHOTT
James Stewart (Donation)
James Tully (Donation)
Jan Janssen
Jan Suhr (Donation)
Jan-Erik Solheim
Janet Albrechtsen
Janet Daley
Janice Meyer (Donation)
Japan Earthquake
Jarl R. Ahlbeck
Jasper Kirkby
Jay Ambrose
Jay Lehr
Jay Richards
Jean Michel (Donation)
Jean-Michel Bélouve
Jeb Bush
Jeff Jacoby
Jeff Kuhn
Jeff Mirus
Jeff Poor
Jeffrey Bossert Clark
Jeffrey Folks
Jeffrey Glassman
Jeffrey Jagmin (Donation)
Jeffrey T. Kuhner
Jennifer Marohasy
Jeremy Clarkson
Jeremy Ross
Jerome Bastien
Jerome J. Schmitt
Jerry Taylor
Jet Stream Shift
Jill Farrell
Jim Berkland
Jim Chiodo
Jim Crawford
Jim Elsner
Jim Guirard
Jim Hollingsworth
Jim Lacey
Jim Luse
Jim Macdonald
Jim McConalogue
Jim O'Neill
Jim Peden
Jim Salinger
Joanne Nova
Joe Bastardi
Joe Daleo
Joe Fone
JOEL CONNELLY
Joel Gehrke
Johannes Schreuder (Donation)
John A. Shanahan
John Abbot
John Barnhart
John Brandt
John Brignell
John Burtis
John Christy
John Coleman
John Daly
John Droz, Jr
John Dunn
John Griffing
John H. Sununu
John Hinderaker
John Humphrys
John K. Swayze
John L. Casey
John Leonard
John Lott
John Lucas (Donation)
JOHN M. BRODER
John Mackey
John Mangun
John McLaughlin
John McLean
John Nicol
John O'Sullivan
John P. Costella
John Rabb (Donation)
John Ransom
John Redwood
John Reid
John Robson
John Rosenthal
John Spooner
John Stossel
John Sutherland
John Vennari
John Ziraldo
John Zyrkowski
Johnny Ball
Jon E McCloskey (Donation)
Jon Ferry
Jonathan A. Lesser
Jonathan Drake
Jonathan Drake (Donation)
Jonathan DuHamel
Jonathan Powell
Jonathon Moseley
Joseph A Olson
Joseph Bast
Joseph Bencini (Donation)
Joseph E. Postma
Joseph Farah
Josh Fulton
Judith Curry
Julia Reid (UKIP Member)
Julian Kenny
Jürgen Krönig
Jurriaan Maessen
Jyrki Kauppisen
KangarooGate
Karin McQuillan
Karl Bohnak
Kelly O'Connell
Kelvin Kemm
Ken Cuccinelli
Ken Green
Ken Ring
Ken Stewart
Ken Ward Jr.
Kenneth Haapala
Kenneth P. Green
Kesten C. Green
Kevin Baldeosingh
Kevin Klees
Kevin Libin
Kevin Mooney
Kevin VS Marshall (Donation)
Kevin Watts (Donation)
KIMBERLEY A. STRASSEL
Kingsley Guy
Kirk Melhuish
Kirk Myers
Kirtland Griffin
Kiwigate
Kjell Stordahl
Klaus L.E. Kaiser
Klaus-Eckart Puls
L. GORDON CROVITZ
Lance Endersbee
Larrey Anderson
Larry Bell
Larry Cosgrove
Laura Hills (Donation)
Laurence I. Gould
Law/Policy
Lawrence Solomon
Lee C. Gerhard
Leighton Steward
Len Srigley (Donation)
Leo Hickman
Leon Ashby
Leon Clifford
Leonard Weinstein
Let It Be
Letter
Letters@ClimateRealists.Com
Lewis Page
LF Khilyuk
Little Ice Age - BIG Chill
Lona Landowski (Donation)
Lord Beaverbrook
Lord Lawson
Lord Monckton
Lord Turnbull
Lorne Gunter
Lorrie Goldstein
Louis Woodhill
Lubos Motl
Lucka Kajfež Bogataj
Luke Barnard
Lyn Jenkins
M. Paul Lloyd
Mac Johnson
Madhav L Khandekar
Magnetic Polar Shift
MalariaGate
Malcolm Colless
Malcolm Roberts
Mann Made Climate Change
Marc Morano
Marc Sheppard
Marcel Meyer (Donation)
Marcus Brooks
Marie Luise Dött
Marita Noon
Mark Howarth
Mark Landsbaum
Mark Lawson
Mark Paquette
Mark Phillips (Donation)
Mark Piney (Donation)
Mark R. Warner
Mark Schumacher
Mark Shea
Mark Vogan
Mark W. Hendrickson
Martha Montelongo
Martin Cohen
Martin Durkin
Martin Hertzberg
Martin Hodgkins (Donation)
Martin Hurd (Donation)
Martyn Brown
Matt and Janet Thompson
Matt Dempsey
Matt Gurney
MATT PATTERSON
Matt Philbin
Matt Ridley
Matthew Cawood
Matthew Penn
Matthew Proctor (Donation)
Matthew Sinclair
Matti Vooro
Maurice Newman
Maurizio Morabito
Maxwell T. Boykoff
Meet The Sceptics
Meetings
Melanie Phillips
Merv Bendle
Met Office
Met Office BBQ Summer
Met Office Climate Scam
Met Office Decadal Forecast
Met Office Long Range Forecasts
Mexico 2010 Cop16
Michael Andrews
Michael Asher
Michael Asten
Michael Atkinson (Donation)
Michael Babbitt (Donation)
Michael Barone
Michael Beenstock
Michael Boyles (Donation)
Michael Buerk
Michael Cejnar (Donation)
Michael Coren
Michael Crichton
Michael F. Haverluck
Michael Hammer
Michael J. Economides
Michael Lind
Michael Miller (Donation)
Michael O'Leary
Michael Oberndorf
Michael R. Fox
Michael Shellenberger
Michael Shermer
Mike Foreman (Donation)
MIKE HULME
Mike Lockwood
Mike Norton-Griffiths
Mike Sneddon (Donation)
Million Kid March
Miranda Devine
Mobile Site
Mohib Ebrahim
Mojib Latif
Monthly Eclipse
Mr. FOIA (hero of Climategate email's)
Murdo MacDonald (Donation)
Muriel Newman
Murry Salby
Music
Mytheos Holt
Name Calling
Nancy Greene-Raine
Nancy J. Thorner
Nancy Neale
NASA
Nasif S. Nahle
Neal Bennet (Donation)
NED ROZELL
Neil Collins
Neil Henderson
Neil Mahony (Donation)
Neil McKnight (Donation)
Neil Reynolds
Neil Snyder
Neville Nicholls
New Site
Newsletter
Newspaper Article
Newt Gingrich
Nicholas Drapela
Nicholas Ricketts (Donation)
Nick Minchin
NICOLA SCAFETTA
Nigel Calder
Nigel Farage
Nigel Sitwell (Donation)
Niger Innis
Nikolai Dobretsov
Nils-Axel Mörner
Nir Shaviv
Noel Matthews
Noel Sheppard
Noor van Andel
Norm Kalmanovitch
Norman Alexander (Donation)
Norman Page
Norman Rogers
North Sea Storm Surge
Not Evil Just Wrong
Occupy Wall Street Protest
OG Sorokhtin
Ole Humlum
Oliver K. Manuel
Open Letter/Fax
Opinion
Opposing Views
Orrin G. Hatch
P Gosselin
Pachauri Conflict of Interest
Pal Brekke
Papers Challenging AGW
Pat Michaels
Patrick Henningsen
Patrick McMahon
Patrick Moore
Patrick Q Collins (Donation)
Patrik Jonsson
Paul Biggs
Paul C. Knappenberger
Paul Chesser
Paul Crovo
Paul Driessen
Paul H. Jossey
Paul Hamaker
Paul Homewood
Paul Hudson
Paul M. Murray
Paul Macrae
Paul Mulshine
Paul Murdock
Paul Oakley
Paul Roderick Gregory
Paul Shlichta
Paul Vreymans
Paul Wornham
Penn & Teller
Penny Rodriguez
PETE DU PONT
Peter A. Ziegler
Peter Ainsley (Donation)
Peter Buxton (Donation)
Peter C Glover
Peter Farrell
Peter Ferrara
Peter Ferro (Donation)
Peter Foster
Peter Foukal
Peter Gill
Peter Heck
Peter Hitchens
Peter J. Havanac
Peter LaChance
Peter Landesman
Peter Lilley
Peter Ravenscroft
Peter Schwerdtfeger
Peter Sissons
Peter Spencer
Peter Taylor
Peter Wilson
PETITION
Petr Chylek
Petter Tuvnes (Donation)
Phelim McAleer
Phil Bottomley (UKIP Supporter)
Phil Brennan
Phil Green
Phil Valentine
Philip Foster
Philip J. Klotzbach
Philip Sherwell
Philip Stott
Phillip A W Bratby
Phillip Leavitt (Donation)
PhotoGate
Pierre Latour
Pierre R. Latour
Piers Akerman
Piers Corbyn
Play
Please Donate
Pointman
Polarbeargate
Press Release
Prop 23
Public Poll (Climate Realists)
Public Polls
Public Warning
Q & A
QR Code
Queensland Flood
Rael Jean Isaac
Ralph Hostetter
Ralph Percy
Ralph Selman (Donation)
Randall Hoven
Randy Fardal
Raven Clabough
Ray Bates
Raymond Richman
Rebecca Terrell
Repeal The Act
Reply To Article
Reply To Letter
Reply To Media
Reply To Video
Report
Retraction
Rex Burr (Donation)
Rex Murphy
Reynold Stone (Donation)
Rhodes Fairbridge
Rich Apuzzo
Rich Lowry
Rich Trzupek
Richard Baehr
Richard Bruce (Donation)
Richard Cohen
Richard Courtney
Richard F. Yanda
Richard Haddad
Richard Holle
Richard J. Grant
Richard James
Richard Lamb (Donation)
Richard Lindzen
Richard Littlejohn
Richard Mackey
Richard North
Richard Pollock
Richard Treadgold
Richard Wellings
Rick Moran
Rick Perry
Rick Santorum
Rik Myslewski
Ritesh Arya
Rob Lyons
Rob Smith
Robert Bryce
Robert Coombes (Donation)
Robert D. Brinsmead
Robert Donnelly (Donation)
Robert Ellison
Robert Ferebauer (Donation)
Robert Ferguson
Robert H. Austin
Robert Hodges
Robert Laughlin
Robert M Wagner
Robert Matthews
Robert Rohlfing
Robert Sprinkel
Robert Tracinski
Robert W. Endlich
Robert W. Felix
Robert W. Wood
Robert Wood (Donation)
Robin Horbury
Robyn Wolfe (Donation)
Rod Liddle
Roger Andrews
Roger Aronoff
Roger F. Gay
ROGER HELMER
Roger L. Simon
Roger Pielke Jr.
Roger Pielke Sr.
Roger Tallbloke
Roger W. Cohen
Ron House
Ron Johnson
Ron Nurwisah
Ronald D. Voisin
Ronald Pate (Donation)
Ronald R. Cooke
Ross Clark
Ross Kaminsky
Ross McKitrick
Rosslyn Smith
Roy Clark
Roy Eappen (Donation)
Roy Spencer
Royal Society Review
Rupert Darwall
Rupert Wyndham
Russell Cook
Russian Temperature Data
Ruth Dudley Edwards
Ruth Lea
Ruth Rodger (Donation)
Ryan Maue
Salvatore Del Prete
Sammy Benoit
Sammy Wilson
Samuel Rodriquez
Sarah Palin
SatelliteGate
Satire
Science Under Attack
Scott Armstrong
Scott Denning
Sea Chart
Sea Level Gate
Sebastian Lüning
Selvaraj Kandasamy
Selwyn Duke
Shannon Goessling
Sherman Griffith (Donation)
Shunichi Akasofu
Simon Heffer
Simon Turnill
Site Announcements
Skeptic's Guide
Social Networking
Solar Climate Change
Solar Cycle 24
Solar Cycle 25
Solar Flare & Earthquake 2013
Solar News
SolarCycle25.com
SPICE
Sponsorship Donation FootstepMaps.com.au
Sponsorship Donation InfoComm Engineering
Spot The Deliberate Mistake
Spot The Difference
Stanislav Mishin
Stanley J. Penkala
Statement
Stefan Gorzula
Stephen Ashworth
Stephen Doughty
Stephen Glover
Stephen Murgatroyd
Stephen Wilde
Sterling Burnett
Steve Bettison
Steve Dickman (Donation)
Steve Fielding
Steve Goreham
Steve Hansen
Steve Jobs
Steve LaNore
Steve McIntyre
Steve Running
Steve Watson
Steven F. Hayward
Steven Goddard
Steven H. Yaskell
Steven Milloy
Stewart Franks
Stewart Meagher
Stuart Blackman
Stuart Clark
Supermoon
Svend Hendriksen
Swine Flu
Syun Akasofu
Tait Trussell
Ted Nordhaus
Teena Clipston
Terence Corcoran
Terence P. Jeffrey
Terrence Aym
Terri Jackson
Terry Crowley
Terry Hurlbut
Terry McCrann
The Branch Carbonian
The Emperor's New Clothes
The Geological Society
The Great Global Warming Swindle
The Green Swindle
The Greenhouse Conspiracy
The Marshall Institute
The Royal Society of New Zealand
The Rules Of The Game
Thomas Costello
Thomas E. Brewton
Thomas Fuller
Thomas Gillan (Donation)
Thomas Lifson
THOMAS P. SHEAHEN
Thomas Richard
Tim Ball
Tim Blair
Tim Channon
Tim Coleman
Tim Cullen
Tim Schowalter
Tim Stanley
Tim Worstall
Timothy Birdnow
Timothy Casey
Timothy Crome (Donation)
Todd Kuipers (Donation)
Tom Bethell
Tom Chivers
Tom Harris
Tom Nelson
Tom Quirk
Tom Russell
Tom V. Segalstad
Tony Abbott
Tony Elliott
Tony Hake
Tony Newbery
Tony Pann
Tony Phillips
Tony Rose
Torben Sørensen (Donation)
Transcript
Transit of Venus
Tree Ring Data
TreeGate
Trevor Kavanagh
Tropical Storm "Power Up" 2013
Trudy Schuett
True or False?
True Stetson
Truth Squad
Try this at home
Twitter
Tyler Watts

Click to get your own widget

CO2 Contributed by
Human Activity:
12 to 15ppmv

Letters
Disclaimer
  • » News articles may contain quotes, these are copyright to the respective publication which will be stated, along with a link to the source article where available.
  • » If you feel your copyright has been violated please contact us and the article will be removed or amended at your request.
Articles Recently Viewed

4,680

Donations
  • » Please support the site by making a donation. No matter how big or small, your contribution helps to support the cause.
Recent Most Read

Show #11-20

See Stephen Wilde's Latest Article

Show articles by Stephen Wilde

All Time Most Read

Show #11-20

Climate Depot Feed
  • » Feed Error