Articles Tagged "Comment"

Before we go into the Christmas holiday we would like you to take a look at the latest information on the Petition Project,

31,072 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,021 with PhDs

Have a look at the following list of Names

Then ask yourself just one question....how can you have a "consensus" when so many say, there is no such thing as "Man Made Climate Change"

We are going to win this, who says? THE SUN, World Temperatures will keep falling and CO2 will continue to rise in 2009, 2010, 2011...

Have a Happy Christmas

Gabriel & MRZippy

Here is a very mixed bag of reporting from ScienceDaily, when you read this article it says it's the Sun and then says it's not the Sun. What it is trying to say is that they can follow a correlation in the solar activity in the past but are unable to apply the same logic in recent years as the CO2 theory would not work!

The reason they are unable to apply the solar activity in modern times is that it will put a spanner in the works. A higher amount of solar activity since the 1950's has warmed the oceans releasing more CO2 into the atmosphere. This article does not account for this, instead it insists the extra CO2 from man made emissions has driven world temperatures out of control, if this is the case then why are world temperatures falling and CO2 is still rising?

“While changes in the solar activity were a main driver of temperature variations in the pre-industrial period, the temperatures in the Altai have shown a much higher rate of increase than that of solar activity during the past 150 years. The strong increase in the industrial period, however, correlates with the increase in the concentration of the greenhouse gas CO2 over this time.

This article is full of contradictions, but still worth a read.

It's little wonder that people misunderstand research when it contains a spurious result. Take this analysis from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, they have looked at the micro time frame from 5000 years ago and have concluded the effect of farming on the climate. They have no answers as to why the continuation of farming then resulted with the opposite effect on the climate at a later date. It's as if they only wanted the research to show what they only wanted to see, and this is the nature of the problem today!

Using powerful supercomputers and advanced climate models, the researchers concluded that methane and carbon dioxide - the building blocks of global warming - began rising with the introduction of rice cultivation and large-scale tree removal. "I think that the take-home message is that this hypothesis shows that climates are extremely sensitive to small variations in greenhouse gases," said Steve Vavrus, a climatologist at UW's Center for Climatic Research.

This story by James Randerson the science correspondent from The Guardian labels 2008 as being the 10th hottest year. What he fails to inform the readers is that CO2 is still rising and yet world temperatures are falling, this is the missing piece of the jigsaw or the 600 pound gorilla in the room. You would have thought 10 years worth of "human emissions" could have added enough CO2 to the planet, enough to surpass the warming high set in 1998. But no, James lets the readers believe that our climate is out of control and things will get worse. The only thing that will get worse is the label of being a science correspondent for The Guardian, enough of this nonsense James, it's the SUN that warms and cools the planet NOT MAN.

"Human influence, particularly emission of greenhouse gases, has greatly increased the chance of having such warm years. Comparing observations with the expected response to manmade and natural drivers of climate change it is shown that global temperature is now over 0.7C warmer than if humans were not altering the climate," said Dr Peter Stott of the Met Office.

See BBC link BBC and also Telegraph, Independent, and Daily Mail

The other side of the fence seems to be on another planet, but not in this solar system, otherwise the other planet would also have the same problem as ours, global cooling, not global warming. The only part of this article that passed the point of no return, is the journalist who seems to have "Climate Cognitive Dissonance".

Scientists have found the first unequivocal evidence that the Arctic region is warming at a faster rate than the rest of the world at least a decade before it was predicted to happen.

This is from the other side of the fence, can someone please send for a psychiatrist, cognitive dissonance seems to be in full display with journalists from The Guardian.....

It's much worse than we thought. An emergency review of climate change is needed immediately

From TGDaily, the Trendwatch section by Rick C. Hodgin, has, to put it mildly, a lot of "alarmist nonsense". Rick gives a short summary of the recent warming and then lets fly with the prediction that 2015 will be the dawn of hotter world temperatures.

There is no science behind this prediction it's just a "say so", Rick, and many others, firmly think that CO2 drive's temperature. I hope that one day we will all look back on this episode in humanity and laugh, however I think not, you should remember there are people starving in the world as a result of this. It's those people we should take time out to think about, if those people only had the money and same resources spent as Rick and the gang, then a couple of decades of natural warming on the Earth from the Sun would be nothing to be concerned about.

Whilst it's easy to "Brainwash" climate protesters that the use of coal on energy to give us power, and the flight of airplanes are damaging our climate, we should all take time out to think about the real affect of "climate ignorance". People die each day though starvation, whilst billions are being misspent on a fantasy.

This Guardian news article by James Randerson just shows how far the News Paper is removed from the reality of the world temperature recordings. We recently had a poll concerning this very issue, Have the media been corrupted to portray that Global Temperatures are becoming warmer or just plain stupid? The result was very close between Currupt 52% & Stupid 46% with the balance, Not Sure 2%.

The relatively chilly temperatures compared with recent years are not evidence that global warming is slowing, say climate scientists at the Met Office. "Absolutely not," said Dr Peter Stott, the manager of understanding and attributing climate change at the Met Office's Hadley Centre. "If we are going to understand climate change we need to look at long-term trends."

History tells us many things, and we are sure if this idea had gone ahead to try and reduce the level of CO2 in the atmosphere by adding chemicals into the ocean, history again would have taught us something to learn from.

For those of you who were not aware of this absurdity and at what lengths the "Man Made Climate Change" industry are proposing to go to achieve their ultimate goal, we can assure you, "you aint seen nothing yet". Al Gore and the IPCC will not stop at nothing in the pursuit of the madness called "Man Made Climate Change".

The pursuit of this madness is on the basis that an increase in CO2 changes the Earths Temperature, this meddling to offset the effects of the Sun is from now on referred to and hereafter as nothing more and nothing less then 'Climate Alchemy'

The Al Gore and the IPCC media and publicity machine that puts fear and anxiety into people concerning "Man Made Climate Change", are now referred to hereafter as nothing more and nothing less then CLIMATE ALCHEMISTS..

Their obsession with CO2 mirrors that of the Alchemists, they wish to believe that the properties of CO2 can make changes to our climate in the same way Alchemists believed they could turn Coal into Gold.

This story is from Reuters by Madeline Chambers.

Extract: -

BONN, Germany (Reuters) - Nearly 200 countries agreed on Friday to a moratorium on projects to fight climate change by adding nutrients to the seas to spur growth of carbon-absorbing algae.

The surprise deal followed 12 days of haggling at the U.N.'s Convention on Biological Diversity conference where Australia, Brazil and China had opposed until the last minute, halting the controversial plans for "ocean fertilization".