Image source + Modification
At a time when NASA satellite data confirms Earth’s atmosphere is NOT trapping heat from carbon dioxide, isn’t it time for climatologists to take a fresh look at their global warming hypothesis?
A growing number of independent scientists, applying the latest satellite data, are strident in their argument that there is no longer any credible scientific evidence to support the faltering greenhouse gas effect (GHE), the cornerstone of UN climate science.
Since its inception in 1988, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has assumed that human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) would add to a ‘heat trapping’ effect in the atmosphere. They argued that, if left unchecked, the trapped heat would cause runaway global warming. However, this latest study of real-world data shows no such trapped heat, despite significant increases in atmospheric CO2. Now, more scientists are arguing for the abandonment of the faltering hypothesis altogether.
Author of the study, Dr. Roy Spencer, is a respected climatologist and principal researcher in the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. Despite his findings he still insists that the greenhouse gas effect is real and must cause SOME warming. Well, where is it, Roy?
NASA Satellite Data Supports Slayers Group of GHE Critics
In
ScienceDaily (July 29, 2011) Dr. Spencer concedes,
“The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show. There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans.”
But Dr. Spencer’s findings are music to the ears of the ‘Slayers’ group of GHE critics who, in their 2010 book, ‘
Slaying the Sky Dragon: Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory’ predicted satellite evidence would eventually help affirm the greenhouse gas effect is mere junk science.
Powerful new physics paper shows how climate modellers treated Earth like a star ignoring night and day temperature differences. Fudged equations exposed.
1%
13%
86%
Tweet Article
Post to Facebook
Print Article