Q:
The ocean acid issue is a waste of time and effort because the oceans were more acid or rather less alkaline in the past with little or no ill effects.
Geo-engineering is not a solution even if there was a problem because we are not at a technical level where we understand the basics of climate well enough to know what would be needed. As is evident from the recent papers released from CRU and reports from IPCC the historical records are distorted to an extent that we do not know within degrees centigrade whether the globe is warming or cooling or on what time period to reference or comparisons. I think a 5 cycle reference period would be best but a 2 cycle period would be sufficient to get a feel of what we are looking for. This "Cherry Picking" reference periods that provide desired results goes against scientific principles and is definite evidence of invoking the "Mystic Arts".
There is a consensus among those who studied and practice many of the occult arts and those who consult them, paying money for their predictions. They also believe their results are correct. This places "Climate Science" among the other Occult groups. It also shows that one would get as good or better answers to questions about future climate by asking your local Palmist, Card reader, or your local Astrologer.