Climate Realist wrote:Monckton has not confused area with volume! Where on earth did you get that from? John Abrahams and his pack of lies about Monckton?? Monckton has completely undermined everything Abrahams lied against him. Monckton 1 Abrahams 0.
As for insulting us, calling us "stupid" I have reported you to a moderator. Please behave, be civil or you may be banned!
As for your questions- I have already answered all your questions in full. just because you don't like the answers- i.e. the truth of the science and data is that CAGW is nothing but a scam and a rip-off then that is your problem. I suggest you read my answers that I have already posted on other threads in full answer to your questions again. Think about them, study some science (as you clearly have no knowledge of science) and then you will stop being such a huge denier of natural climate change.
Climate Realist wrote:Grouper- please post something of worth to this forum! Your above post is nonsense. I will again report you to a moderator as I believe you do not want to debate the science of climate but are trying to insult folks and get a response. This type of behavior in known as "trolling".
Again you refuse to answer the simplest of questions, where does Monckton confuse surface area with volume???
Climate Realist wrote:Thank you Groupers for giving me a handy link to the excellent Monckton presentation. It was a pleasure to re- read! Contrary to what you have claimed, time and time again, Monckton does not mention volume and surface area or confuse them he talks of sea ice extent.
Sorry, I think it is you, Groupers who is confused.
What you should do is read the monckton paper you sent me then check his data. You will find all his sources sound and all his points are therefore valid.
Gore has "lahd"!
There is no climate change/ global warming crisis and man cannot (yet) control the weather.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest