If Q has gone shall I remove his articles?

[Climate Realist]

Monckton has not confused area with volume! Where on earth did you get that from? John Abrahams and his pack of lies about Monckton?? Monckton has completely undermined everything Abrahams lied against him. Monckton 1 Abrahams 0.

As for insulting us, calling us "stupid" I have reported you to a moderator. Please behave, be civil or you may be banned!

As for your questions- I have already answered all your questions in full. just because you don't like the answers- i.e. the truth of the science and data is that CAGW is nothing but a scam and a rip-off then that is your problem. I suggest you read my answers that I have already posted on other threads in full answer to your questions again. Think about them, study some science (as you clearly have no knowledge of science) and then you will stop being such a huge denier of natural climate change.

[Gropes]

.

[Gropes]

.

[Gropes]

Monckton has not confused area with volume! Where on earth did you get that from? John Abrahams and his pack of lies about Monckton?? Monckton has completely undermined everything Abrahams lied against him. Monckton 1 Abrahams 0.

As for insulting us, calling us "stupid" I have reported you to a moderator. Please behave, be civil or you may be banned!

As for your questions- I have already answered all your questions in full. just because you don't like the answers- i.e. the truth of the science and data is that CAGW is nothing but a scam and a rip-off then that is your problem. I suggest you read my answers that I have already posted on other threads in full answer to your questions again. Think about them, study some science (as you clearly have no knowledge of science) and then you will stop being such a huge denier of natural climate change.

Nope you still haven't answered the question, why did Lord Monckton deliberately confuse surface area and volume to show Arctic cooling. There's certainly nothing wrong with the graph he's shown, but he's merely using it show that the Arctic is cooling which is misleading. NASA clearly states that the Arctic is warming.

As for insulting, my name is gropes, not groupie or grouper. As for calling you stupid, forgive me, didn't mean to upset you even though you do come across as stupid. But I'm sure you are not stupid, maybe a tool, or a spanner, or a few sandwiches short of a picnic, but not stupid.

[Climate Realist]

Grouper- please post something of worth to this forum! Your above post is nonsense. I will again report you to a moderator as I believe you do not want to debate the science of climate but are trying to insult folks and get a response. This type of behavior in known as "trolling".

Again you refuse to answer the simplest of questions, where does Monckton confuse surface area with volume???

[Gropes]

Grouper- please post something of worth to this forum! Your above post is nonsense. I will again report you to a moderator as I believe you do not want to debate the science of climate but are trying to insult folks and get a response. This type of behavior in known as "trolling".

Again you refuse to answer the simplest of questions, where does Monckton confuse surface area with volume???

Oh dear, I thought that was the whole point, afterall, everything you and your lot posted is misleading and worthless. I was merely responding to your worthless posts.

But I take it you've never seen Monckton's presentations or even studied his slides? Check out the Youtube video that this presentation is used in. Look out for his description of sea-ice extent. It's one of his first points.

http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/ ... n_2009.pdf

[Climate Realist]

I have seen Monckton's presentations- all based on sound and solid science- complete with references. It is you Grouper that does not know any science and therefore cannot follow a science presentation, even if, as Monckton does, it is pitched at the layman.

I suggest you read Moncktons answer to John Abraham where he demolishes every criticism, point by point.

I suggest you go and study, maths physics and chemistry at least to A level then coma back and debate, when you are able.

[Climate Realist]

Thank you Groupers for giving me a handy link to the excellent Monckton presentation. It was a pleasure to re- read! Contrary to what you have claimed, time and time again, Monckton does not mention volume and surface area or confuse them he talks of sea ice extent.

Sorry, I think it is you, Groupers who is confused.

What you should do is read the monckton paper you sent me then check his data. You will find all his sources sound and all his points are therefore valid.

Gore has "lahd"!

There is no climate change/ global warming crisis and man cannot (yet) control the weather.

[Gropes]

Thank you Groupers for giving me a handy link to the excellent Monckton presentation. It was a pleasure to re- read! Contrary to what you have claimed, time and time again, Monckton does not mention volume and surface area or confuse them he talks of sea ice extent.

Sorry, I think it is you, Groupers who is confused.

What you should do is read the monckton paper you sent me then check his data. You will find all his sources sound and all his points are therefore valid.

Gore has "lahd"!

There is no climate change/ global warming crisis and man cannot (yet) control the weather.

I see like Lord Mockton you like to play on words. It is clear from NASA studies that the Arctic is warming. Perhaps this video would give a better description of Lord Monckton's deception?

http://www.youtube.com/user/greenman361 ... fA1LpiYk2o

Or perhaps, it would be better to get a defintion of what's happening in the Arctic from NASA?

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/featur ... inice.html

But hey, you be the judge, afterall, for you lot, science bashing is much more fun.

[Climate Realist]

according to the lying activist James Hansen maybe.

But in reality (see WUWT for the info) summer temperatures in the Arctic have not increased for years. The changes in ice is due to wind patterns.

Like i said- you need to study some science so you actually know what you are talking about before trying to debate. Are you afraid that if you learn the science your beliefs will crumble around you?? because they will. CAGW is fake, as are you.