If Q has gone shall I remove his articles?

[Climate Realist]

You are being the troll here. To answe again:-

if you are going to not listen to me and just repeat the same thing, then two can play at that game.

I have answered all questions in full, I suggest you take your own advice!

If you have questions about MONCKTON he is capable of defending himself as he did against Abrahams very well. I suggest you ask him. he did not confuse area and volume.

That you tube video is nothing but a pile or climate alarmist propaganda. You would do better to listen to the source- i.e Monckton himself.

[Gropes]

You are being the troll here. To answe again:-

if you are going to not listen to me and just repeat the same thing, then two can play at that game.

I have answered all questions in full, I suggest you take your own advice!

If you have questions about MONCKTON he is capable of defending himself as he did against Abrahams very well. I suggest you ask him. he did not confuse area and volume.

That you tube video is nothing but a pile or climate alarmist propaganda. You would do better to listen to the source- i.e Monckton himself.

Why did Monckton not mention volume in his presentation? Is it because it would have blown his case out of the water? Simple question, please answer it.

[Climate Realist]

Volume is fine- see WUWT article.
You are being the troll here. To answer again:-

if you are going to not listen to me and just repeat the same thing, then two can play at that game.

I have answered all questions in full, I suggest you take your own advice!

If you have questions about MONCKTON he is capable of defending himself as he did against Abrahams very well. I suggest you ask him. he did not confuse area and volume.

That you tube video is nothing but a pile or climate alarmist propaganda. You would do better to listen to the source- i.e Monckton himself.

[Gropes]

Volume is fine- see WUWT article.
You are being the troll here. To answer again:-

if you are going to not listen to me and just repeat the same thing, then two can play at that game.

I have answered all questions in full, I suggest you take your own advice!

If you have questions about MONCKTON he is capable of defending himself as he did against Abrahams very well. I suggest you ask him. he did not confuse area and volume.

That you tube video is nothing but a pile or climate alarmist propaganda. You would do better to listen to the source- i.e Monckton himself.

Hello, stop digressing, we're talking about Monckton. Again, why did Monckton not mention volume in his presentation? Is it to give a misleading picture. I'm not prepared to digress onto another subject because you can't answer the first point.

[Climate Realist]

You are the king of digression, this is a thread about removing Q's articles not aboue Monckton.

Volume is fine- see WUWT article.
You are being the troll here. To answer again:-

if you are going to not listen to me and just repeat the same thing, then two can play at that game.

I have answered all questions in full, I suggest you take your own advice!

If you have questions about MONCKTON he is capable of defending himself as he did against Abrahams very well. I suggest you ask him. he did not confuse area and volume.

That you tube video is nothing but a pile or climate alarmist propaganda. You would do better to listen to the source- i.e Monckton himself.

[Gropes]

You are the king of digression, this is a thread about removing Q's articles not aboue Monckton.

Volume is fine- see WUWT article.
You are being the troll here. To answer again:-

if you are going to not listen to me and just repeat the same thing, then two can play at that game.

I have answered all questions in full, I suggest you take your own advice!

If you have questions about MONCKTON he is capable of defending himself as he did against Abrahams very well. I suggest you ask him. he did not confuse area and volume.

That you tube video is nothing but a pile or climate alarmist propaganda. You would do better to listen to the source- i.e Monckton himself.

You lot mentioned me, so I'm here. I asked these questions three months ago and you lot successfully failed to answer it. All of you. Looks like you and your pals are just a bunch of armchair hacks. I'm not a scientist, I fully admit, but I know where to get my sources. But it's you lot can't even do the basics and you lot think you are in the major leagues, get real buddy.

[Climate Realist]

THIS IS NOT WORK SOFWARE!!! TIME WASTER<
GROUPER IS WASTING HER TIME AT WORK BY READING THIS.
SUPERVISOR, PLEASE ADMINISTER DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDURES

[Gropes]

THIS IS NOT WORK SOFWARE!!! TIME WASTER<
GROUPER IS WASTING HER TIME AT WORK BY READING THIS.
SUPERVISOR, PLEASE ADMINISTER DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDURES

You must be getting desperate CR,

Why don't you just answer the question... You lot ask me for some counter points on the Lord Monckton video. It's been three months, why don't you answer the question instead of spreading your usual denialist claptrap

[Mike Davis]

Groupie:
Please provide us with more information that displays you "Anal retentive" nature.
Ice volume has no meaning because there is nothing to compare it to. That is the same for extent and area.The 31 years of satellite data covers only a portion of a cycle that the Arctic region experiences. The only thing those three observations show is the wind and current activity and they are not a very accurate measurement when 15 or 30% equals 100% for evaluation results. The improvements in resolution of observations over the period means you are comparing totally different results, They are not measuring the same thing. There is a large difference between a one meter resolution and a one kilometer resolution and that is about the improvement in equipment during that period of time.
The entire AGW position is based on a trash heap of unreliable information that has become worse than anecdotal because of the attempts to adjust to fit a desired result.

[Climate Realist]

THIS IS NOT WORK SOFWARE!!! TIME WASTER<
GROUPER IS WASTING HER TIME AT WORK BY READING THIS.
SUPERVISOR, PLEASE ADMINISTER DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDURES