If Q has gone shall I remove his articles?

[Gorilla Tan]

Gee. Reading for some time...why is it that CR and others bitch that Gropes is somehow a troll, while not once do they show the ordinary civility of addressing that poster properly? Seems that intentionally distorting someone's name is pretty obviously an expression of hostility. And serves to dodge the questions at hand. Hey?

[Mike Davis]

Groupie:
We have answered your questions. You can not get your head out of your long enough to realize that. Monckton is a big boy and does not need us to defend his words. If he wants to make fun of people like you, More power to him. If you keep making the same delusional remarks then you deserve to be ridiculed also. I knew fellow workers that were fired for less activity on company equipment than what you are displaying.
FYI: Use of company IS equipment is monitored and all web sites visited are recorded to find and reward unauthorized behavior. Your use of company equipment could lead to civil action against your employer as well as you for providing you with the means to visit this site.

[Climate Realist]

Gee. Reading for some time...why is it that CR and others bitch that Gropes is somehow a troll, while not once do they show the ordinary civility of addressing that poster properly? Seems that intentionally distorting someone's name is pretty obviously an expression of hostility. And serves to dodge the questions at hand. Hey?

Nice try Grouper, joining under another name this afternoon and then posting under that ID pretenting to be someone else. BTW, we have answered your questions on here many times, It is not our problem if you do not like the answers and continually ask the same questions. I.E Monckton did not confuse area and volume! and Jones did say there has been no statistically significant warming for the last 15 years. We have said all this and yet you ask the questions again and again!

[Mike Davis]

CR:
We still have the gender issue with Groupie and that is why we should probably refer to Groupie as S/HE/IT?. Or SHEIT for a short version.

GT:
gropes
- 3 dictionary results
grope
   /groʊp/ Show Spelled [grohp] Show IPA verb, groped, grop·ing, noun
–verb (used without object)
1.
to feel about with the hands; feel one's way: I had to grope around in the darkness before I found the light switch.
2.
to search blindly or uncertainly: He seemed to be groping for an answer to the question.
–verb (used with object)
3.
to seek by or as if by groping: to grope one's way up the dark stairs.
4.
to touch or handle (someone) for sexual pleasure.
–noun
5.
an act or instance of groping.
6.
Slang . an act or instance of sexually fondling another person.


To me that is an offensive name and Gouupie displays the attributes of a "Groupie"

group·ie (grōō'pē)
n. Slang

1.

A fan, especially a young woman, who follows a rock group around on tours.
2.

An enthusiastic supporter or follower: a ballet groupie; a fashion groupie, an AGW groupie.

[Gorilla Tan]

Groupie:
If you keep making the same delusional remarks then you deserve to be ridiculed also.

NOBODY "deserves" to be ridiculed. Nor constantly frazzed for asking perfectly reasonable questions. Instead of receiving a straight answer. As to the pretty blatant attempt at intimidation over imagined "improper" use of "alleged" employer resources, well, that speaks for itself. Or for its source. And badly.

And Climate Realist: EXCUSE ME. I am NOT Gropes. But I do note the insulting continued mis-naming. Sorry to see it, and I do notice that the moderator has, in another forum thread, kindly called you out on that bit. Hey.

[Gropes]

THIS IS NOT WORK SOFWARE!!! TIME WASTER<
GROUPER IS WASTING HER TIME AT WORK BY READING THIS.
SUPERVISOR, PLEASE ADMINISTER DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDURES

CR, trying to get me the sacks smells of desperation CR. Is this another way of avoiding the question? Why don't you answer the question like a good little boy, why did Monckton not use volume when presenting the state of the Arctic ice?

[Gorilla Tan]

It's odd...what prompted me to sign in was the death today of Dr. Stephen H. Schneider, of Stanford. Here's what the NY Times has to say of him, in part:

He rejected hyperbole, readily conceding that uncertainty was unavoidable in something so complicated and long-term. The conference he had attended in Sweden before his death was partly to discuss how climate-change skeptics use that uncertainty to advance their cause.

But because the costs of global warming — from the melting of icecaps to the flooding of islands — is so high, Dr. Schneider maintained, not acting is riskier than acting. He demanded action from national, international and corporate leaders.

His case was buttressed by the “accumulated preponderance of evidence” scientists had amassed, he said. In an interview with the magazine American Scientist this year, he said his opponents relied on “the political chicanery of ideologists and special interests.”

Gentleman. What are the real answers to Gropes' and earlier Questioner's...questions?

[earthfriend]

Gorilla Tan, Hi, by the way.
you have to read Gropes history of posting, he has asked CR and others the same questiuons over and over- for several monthys. Up until now I have been a lurker but just had to chime in to say that CR and Mike have been patient and extreemly helpful for months answering Gropes repeated questions. They are the good guys in all this.

Gropes just asks the same thing over and over again despite having had the answer spelt out to her, with links an all. She is just causing trouble, and she started the insults long ago, CR and Mike have been remarkably restrained. As for the work thing, I run my own business and would sack anyone blatantly wasting time on the internet like that. CR is doing her a favor by pointing out her error.

GT- check the links CR and Mike are in the right, Gropes is posting nonsense.
regards to you
EF

[earthfriend]

It's odd...what prompted me to sign in was the death today of Dr. Stephen H. Schneider, of Stanford. Here's what the NY Times has to say of him, in part:

He rejected hyperbole, readily conceding that uncertainty was unavoidable in something so complicated and long-term. The conference he had attended in Sweden before his death was partly to discuss how climate-change skeptics use that uncertainty to advance their cause.

But because the costs of global warming — from the melting of icecaps to the flooding of islands — is so high, Dr. Schneider maintained, not acting is riskier than acting. He demanded action from national, international and corporate leaders.

His case was buttressed by the “accumulated preponderance of evidence” scientists had amassed, he said. In an interview with the magazine American Scientist this year, he said his opponents relied on “the political chicanery of ideologists and special interests.”

Gentleman. What are the real answers to Gropes' and earlier Questioner's...questions?

GT- read further back, CR and Mike answered all her questions in full.
regards
EF

[Gropes]

Gee. Reading for some time...why is it that CR and others bitch that Gropes is somehow a troll, while not once do they show the ordinary civility of addressing that poster properly? Seems that intentionally distorting someone's name is pretty obviously an expression of hostility. And serves to dodge the questions at hand. Hey?

Nice try Grouper, joining under another name this afternoon and then posting under that ID pretenting to be someone else. BTW, we have answered your questions on here many times, It is not our problem if you do not like the answers and continually ask the same questions. I.E Monckton did not confuse area and volume! and Jones did say there has been no statistically significant warming for the last 15 years. We have said all this and yet you ask the questions again and again!

Is this another attempt at avoiding my questions? Trying to get me the sack and now accusing of being someone else? Monckton didn't mention volume because mentioning it would have blown his case out of the water. In other words, he wouldn't have been able to make the presentation he did. And you know that because neither can you.

Exactly, Jones said no statiscally significant warming in 15 years. So admit you have been lying. You do understand what statistical significance is?