Skip to content

Climate Realists - The Realists Take on Climate Change
  • Home
  • News Trends
  • Polls
  • Forum
  • FAQs
  • Archive
  • Bios
  • About
  • Contact
The Discussions
  • Board index ‹ The Discussions ‹ The Effect of AGW

  • Print view
  • FAQ
  • Login

Would the forum be more active without people like Q & G

Debate AGW with Questioner and other like minded members.
Topic locked
69 posts • Page 3 of 7 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Re: Would the forum be more active without people like Q & G

Postby Gropes » Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:46 am

Climate Realist wrote:No statistically significant warming is what he said. You are so stupid, it is beyond belief. I'm beginning to think you can't even read properly as I have already explained everything to you. Either that or you are just Trolling.

You will find the interview here:- http://www.bbc.co.uk read it if there are not too many big words for you like "statistically significant".

To the casual reader, grouper is a Troll :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

"Troll (Internet)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Do not feed the trolls" and its abbreviation "DNFTT" redirect here. For the Wikimedia essay , see "What is a troll?" .

In Internet slang , a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous , or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum ,chat room , or blog , with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response [1]or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. [2]In addition to the offending poster, the noun “troll” can also refer to the provocative message itself, as in that was an excellent troll you posted . While the term troll and its associated action, trolling , are primarily associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels highly subjective , with 'trolling' being used to describe many intentionally provocative actions outside of an online context. "


So you admit that he never said no warming in the last 15 years? So you admit you have been lying?
Gropes
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:05 pm
Top

Re: Would the forum be more active without people like Q & G

Postby Climate Realist » Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:53 am

No statistically significant warming is what he said. You need to read what I am saying and think about it. Either that or you are just Trolling.

It is you who is lying.
Climate Realist
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 10:45 am
Location: Kent
Top

Re: Would the forum be more active without people like Q & G

Postby Gropes » Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:57 am

Climate Realist wrote:No statistically significant warming is what he said. You need to read what I am saying and think about it. Either that or you are just Trolling.

It is you who is lying.


So do you or do you not admit that he NEVER said there was no warming in the last 15 years? Simple question, I've asked two simply questions now and so far! Are you playing me and just dancing around my questions????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Gropes
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:05 pm
Top

Re: Would the forum be more active without people like Q & G

Postby Climate Realist » Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:58 am

No statistically significant warming is what he said. You need to read what I am saying and think about it. Either that or you are just Trolling.

You will find the interview here:- http://www.bbc.co.uk read it if there are not too many big words for you like "statistically significant".

To the casual reader, grouper is a Troll :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

"Troll (Internet)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Do not feed the trolls" and its abbreviation "DNFTT" redirect here. For the Wikimedia essay , see "What is a troll?" .

In Internet slang , a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous , or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum ,chat room , or blog , with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response [1]or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. [2]In addition to the offending poster, the noun “troll” can also refer to the provocative message itself, as in that was an excellent troll you posted . While the term troll and its associated action, trolling , are primarily associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels highly subjective , with 'trolling' being used to describe many intentionally provocative actions outside of an online context. "
Climate Realist
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 10:45 am
Location: Kent
Top

Re: Would the forum be more active without people like Q & G

Postby Gropes » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:02 am

Climate Realist wrote:No statistically significant warming is what he said. You need to read what I am saying and think about it. Either that or you are just Trolling.

You will find the interview here:- http://www.bbc.co.uk read it if there are not too many big words for you like "statistically significant".

To the casual reader, grouper is a Troll :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

"Troll (Internet)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Do not feed the trolls" and its abbreviation "DNFTT" redirect here. For the Wikimedia essay , see "What is a troll?" .

In Internet slang , a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous , or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum ,chat room , or blog , with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response [1]or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. [2]In addition to the offending poster, the noun “troll” can also refer to the provocative message itself, as in that was an excellent troll you posted . While the term troll and its associated action, trolling , are primarily associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels highly subjective , with 'trolling' being used to describe many intentionally provocative actions outside of an online context. "


So you admit he NEVER said no warming in the last 15 years? Is that your final answer? So you finally admit you have been lying?
Gropes
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:05 pm
Top

Re: Would the forum be more active without people like Q & G

Postby Climate Realist » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:04 am

Have already answered, here it is again.

No statistically significant warming is what he said. You need to read what I am saying and think about it. Either that or you are just Trolling.

You will find the interview here:- http://www.bbc.co.uk read it if there are not too many big words for you like "statistically significant".

To the casual reader, grouper is a Troll :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

"Troll (Internet)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Do not feed the trolls" and its abbreviation "DNFTT" redirect here. For the Wikimedia essay , see "What is a troll?" .

In Internet slang , a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous , or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum ,chat room , or blog , with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response [1]or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. [2]In addition to the offending poster, the noun “troll” can also refer to the provocative message itself, as in that was an excellent troll you posted . While the term troll and its associated action, trolling , are primarily associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels highly subjective , with 'trolling' being used to describe many intentionally provocative actions outside of an online context. "
Climate Realist
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 10:45 am
Location: Kent
Top

Re: Would the forum be more active without people like Q & G

Postby Gropes » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:04 am

Climate Realist wrote:Have already answered, here it is again.

No statistically significant warming is what he said. You need to read what I am saying and think about it. Either that or you are just Trolling.

You will find the interview here:- http://www.bbc.co.uk read it if there are not too many big words for you like "statistically significant".

To the casual reader, grouper is a Troll :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

"Troll (Internet)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Do not feed the trolls" and its abbreviation "DNFTT" redirect here. For the Wikimedia essay , see "What is a troll?" .

In Internet slang , a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous , or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum ,chat room , or blog , with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response [1]or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. [2]In addition to the offending poster, the noun “troll” can also refer to the provocative message itself, as in that was an excellent troll you posted . While the term troll and its associated action, trolling , are primarily associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels highly subjective , with 'trolling' being used to describe many intentionally provocative actions outside of an online context. "



So you admit he NEVER said no warming in the last 15 years? Is that your final answer? So you finally admit you have been lying?
Gropes
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:05 pm
Top

Re: Would the forum be more active without people like Q & G

Postby Climate Realist » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:07 am

I have never lied. Here is my answer again as you have refused to read it before;

Have already answered, here it is again.

No statistically significant warming is what he said. You need to read what I am saying and think about it. Either that or you are just Trolling.

You will find the interview here:- http://www.bbc.co.uk read it if there are not too many big words for you like "statistically significant".

To the casual reader, grouper is a Troll :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

"Troll (Internet)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Do not feed the trolls" and its abbreviation "DNFTT" redirect here. For the Wikimedia essay , see "What is a troll?" .

In Internet slang , a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous , or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum ,chat room , or blog , with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response [1]or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. [2]In addition to the offending poster, the noun “troll” can also refer to the provocative message itself, as in that was an excellent troll you posted . While the term troll and its associated action, trolling , are primarily associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels highly subjective , with 'trolling' being used to describe many intentionally provocative actions outside of an online context. "
Climate Realist
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 10:45 am
Location: Kent
Top

Re: Would the forum be more active without people like Q & G

Postby Gropes » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:09 am

Climate Realist wrote:I have never lied. Here is my answer again as you have refused to read it before;

Have already answered, here it is again.

No statistically significant warming is what he said. You need to read what I am saying and think about it. Either that or you are just Trolling.

You will find the interview here:- http://www.bbc.co.uk read it if there are not too many big words for you like "statistically significant".

To the casual reader, grouper is a Troll :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

"Troll (Internet)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Do not feed the trolls" and its abbreviation "DNFTT" redirect here. For the Wikimedia essay , see "What is a troll?" .

In Internet slang , a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous , or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum ,chat room , or blog , with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response [1]or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. [2]In addition to the offending poster, the noun “troll” can also refer to the provocative message itself, as in that was an excellent troll you posted . While the term troll and its associated action, trolling , are primarily associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels highly subjective , with 'trolling' being used to describe many intentionally provocative actions outside of an online context. "



So where does he say no warming in the last 15 years? Please find it for me. Do you understand what statistical significance is?
Gropes
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:05 pm
Top

Re: Would the forum be more active without people like Q & G

Postby Climate Realist » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:10 am

Have already answered, here it is again.

No statistically significant warming is what he said. You need to read what I am saying and think about it. Either that or you are just Trolling.

You will find the interview here:- http://www.bbc.co.uk read it if there are not too many big words for you like "statistically significant".

To the casual reader, grouper is a Troll :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

"Troll (Internet)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Do not feed the trolls" and its abbreviation "DNFTT" redirect here. For the Wikimedia essay , see "What is a troll?" .

In Internet slang , a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous , or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum ,chat room , or blog , with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response [1]or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. [2]In addition to the offending poster, the noun “troll” can also refer to the provocative message itself, as in that was an excellent troll you posted . While the term troll and its associated action, trolling , are primarily associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels highly subjective , with 'trolling' being used to describe many intentionally provocative actions outside of an online context. "
Climate Realist
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 10:45 am
Location: Kent
Top

PreviousNext

Topic locked
69 posts • Page 3 of 7 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Return to The Effect of AGW

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

  • Board index
  • The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
cron

© 2008-2013 ClimateRealists.com | Contact Webmaster | Privacy Policy