Climate Realist wrote:Have already answered, here it is again.
No statistically significant warming is what he said. You need to read what I am saying and think about it. Either that or you are just Trolling.
You will find the interview here:- http://www.bbc.co.uk read it if there are not too many big words for you like "statistically significant".
To the casual reader, grouper is a Troll :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Do not feed the trolls" and its abbreviation "DNFTT" redirect here. For the Wikimedia essay , see "What is a troll?" .
In Internet slang , a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous , or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum ,chat room , or blog , with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. In addition to the offending poster, the noun “troll” can also refer to the provocative message itself, as in that was an excellent troll you posted . While the term troll and its associated action, trolling , are primarily associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels highly subjective , with 'trolling' being used to describe many intentionally provocative actions outside of an online context. "
You still can't find where he says it. So I take you finally admit you are a liar? On an other point, do you understand what statiscal significance is?