Would the forum be more active without people like Q & G

[Gropes]

Have already answered, here it is again.

No statistically significant warming is what he said. You need to read what I am saying and think about it. Either that or you are just Trolling.

You will find the interview here:- http://www.bbc.co.uk read it if there are not too many big words for you like "statistically significant".

To the casual reader, grouper is a Troll :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)

"Troll (Internet)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Do not feed the trolls" and its abbreviation "DNFTT" redirect here. For the Wikimedia essay , see "What is a troll?" .

In Internet slang , a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous , or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum ,chat room , or blog , with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response [1]or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. [2]In addition to the offending poster, the noun “troll” can also refer to the provocative message itself, as in that was an excellent troll you posted . While the term troll and its associated action, trolling , are primarily associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels highly subjective , with 'trolling' being used to describe many intentionally provocative actions outside of an online context. "

You still can't find where he says it. So I take you finally admit you are a liar? On an other point, do you understand what statiscal significance is?

[Mike Davis]

CR:
Wiki has got it wrong again because Trolling has been a common term in fishing for years and it has also been used as a slang expression for dangling bait to provoke a desired response from any thing that might take the bait.
Groupie is not actually a troll. S/he/IT is an ANAL retentive and suffering from Cranialanalitis. As far as those like G are concerned we are the ones "Trollinjg because we have the Gaul to actually think AGW is a fantasy, which it is. Q had the same problems but displayed the symptoms with a bit less irritation and not quite so anal retentive Q would Move goal posts to claim victory without realizing the field is actually 4.5 billion years long rather than 180 years or 10 or 30 or whatever amount of time he was trying to use. Q also tended to "Cherry Pick" to claim others were Cherry Picking. Of course Climate is all about "Cherry Picking" your desired "Facts". You always have to pick a start date and end date. You also have to pick an era to use as a reference. You have to find a base concentration to compare with.

If I say we are within the extents of realized climate over the time period displayed by the GRIP ice core I just "Cherry Picked 850 thousand years and one region as an example of natural variation over a given period. If I use the beginning of this Ice Age which some claim is 38 million years ago and some claim is 3.5 million years ago depending on a Cherry picked definition of "Ice Age".
There are no predetermined definitions to be used as reference regarding climate and some of the definitions that have been created have been shown to be wrong such as what period should be considered as a base for average climate comparison to say if what we are experiencing is above or below normal/ average. Normal is a range of events because climate is not static but dynamic and displays a range which we experience on a regional basis. The other thing is that there is no global climate unless it is the range of extremes experienced by all the regions on the globe and the same for a global temperature.

[Ravenna]

Just so we understand what has turned you guys off this forum and onto your forum please drop in a link. We are not convinced it's just down style, but maybe Q etc.

Climate realist is the only one who came to my forum from here.I have not done anything to cause that at all,he came on his own.

MY FORUM:

http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/forums/index.php

My Blog:

http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/

I know it is a mess.Soon that will be fixed.

Both Gropes and Questioner knows about my forum,but they are terrified of joining.Now that you plan to shut down the forum,I will be astonished if Gropes comes over to my forum.He will simply vanish instead.

Really CR, this is the first I heard of it Is it anything like this forum, where a bunch of McExperts going round posting the same ol disinformation carefully spoon fed to you by the denialist industry? But why don't you just answer the original point you asked me to raise in one my first posting. Why did Lord Monckton confuse surface area with volume? What'sthe point of joining your forum when you can't even answer the basic questions?

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=439&start=30

LOL,

I wrote that post NOT CR.

It is pitiful that you lay bare your bias without even knowing what is discussed at my forum.

Just as I opined.You are terrified of my forum.

[Ravenna]

He he...,

There is no discussion going on here,since you guys are talking past one another.This is one reason why this forum is going nowhere.

Where is the Moderator?

[Gropes]

Climate realist is the only one who came to my forum from here.I have not done anything to cause that at all,he came on his own.

MY FORUM:

http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/forums/index.php

My Blog:

http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/

I know it is a mess.Soon that will be fixed.

Both Gropes and Questioner knows about my forum,but they are terrified of joining.Now that you plan to shut down the forum,I will be astonished if Gropes comes over to my forum.He will simply vanish instead.

Really CR, this is the first I heard of it Is it anything like this forum, where a bunch of McExperts going round posting the same ol disinformation carefully spoon fed to you by the denialist industry? But why don't you just answer the original point you asked me to raise in one my first posting. Why did Lord Monckton confuse surface area with volume? What'sthe point of joining your forum when you can't even answer the basic questions?

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=439&start=30

LOL,

I wrote that post NOT CR.

It is pitiful that you lay bare your bias without even knowing what is discussed at my forum.

Just as I opined.You are terrified of my forum.

Hmm, I see you are avoiding my questions YET AGAIN by picking on a mistake I made. Interesting diversionary tactics. How about answering the question I have been asked to pose 3 months ago since this thread viewtopic.php?f=2&t=439&start=30. I've been asking several times on the threads I have been posting lately as well.

So answer me this, why did Lord Monckton not mention volume when giving us the Arctic update? Would have blown his case out of the water.? Be intersting to see if you lot can asnwer since CR, Phil, Mike etc etc have so far failed to answer it.

[Gropes]

He he...,

There is no discussion going on here,since you guys are talking past one another.This is one reason why this forum is going nowhere.

Where is the Moderator?

Hey Ravenna, cut the chit chat and answer the question YOU asked me to pose 3 months ago on this thread viewtopic.php?f=2&t=439&start=30.

Now how about answering it instead of your useless soundbites!

[Ravenna]

I do not recall being part of that discussion about what Monckton stated about volume.

It has been 3 months as you say,by now it should be dropped.

[Gropes]

I do not recall being part of that discussion about what Monckton stated about volume.

It has been 3 months as you say,by now it should be dropped.

Hmm, selective memory or are you completely stupid? Here is the link viewtopic.php?f=2&t=439&start=30

Care to answer my questions you have been spending 3 months avoiding?

Still no counterpoint from you against the Video.

Which particular point do you want to start with? Shall we go from the beginning, the arctic ice coverage? Unfortunately, Lord Monckton doesn't seem to understand the difference between surface area and volume. Perhaps Lord Monckton would like to add to his University of Illinois graph, Arctic Sea Surface Ice. Which is something he conveniently ignores in his presentation.

[Ravenna]

He he...,

There is no discussion going on here,since you guys are talking past one another.This is one reason why this forum is going nowhere.

Where is the Moderator?

Hey Ravenna, cut the chit chat and answer the question YOU asked me to pose 3 months ago on this thread viewtopic.php?f=2&t=439&start=30.

Now how about answering it instead of your useless soundbites!

bwahahahahahahahaha!!!

You are so dishonest.

I did not support the Viscount in that thread.

[Gropes]

He he...,

There is no discussion going on here,since you guys are talking past one another.This is one reason why this forum is going nowhere.

Where is the Moderator?

Hey Ravenna, cut the chit chat and answer the question YOU asked me to pose 3 months ago on this thread viewtopic.php?f=2&t=439&start=30.

Now how about answering it instead of your useless soundbites!

bwahahahahahahahaha!!!

You are so dishonest.

I did not support the Viscount in that thread.

Oh I see, now you are backtracking LOL! You asked for a counterpoint, after 3 months of avoilding my questions, now you wash your hands off it.

Is your forum as pathetic as your answers?