Mike Davis wrote:I already said that Monckton did not talk about thickness and thickness is just a bunch of BS along with an attempt to redirect the issue to another meaningless measurement. There is no current reliable historic record of thickness and volume. This is just as FUDDLE Minded as making some claim about historic sea surface temperatures only worse because there are some historic measurements for sea temperature even though they are not surface temperatures.
Oh my word!
Apparently, thickness of ice is not important! Hey Ravenna/Climate Realist, I hope you invited Mickey to your new forum. You could do with an extra ignoramus to compliment you two!!