The public is the biggest's loser as Greenpeace and the Met Office do not make the effort to turn up at the "Climate Fools Day" conference to learn what has changed our climate in the past 60 years and what will change our climate in the next 100.
What was hailed as the first public meeting to oppose the UK climate bill, The "Climate Fools Day" Anniversary Conference, convened by Piers Corbyn and
WeatherAction.com,was in fact the launch of a long awaited public address to the advances in the Solar Weather Forecasting technique. Piers did not disappoint, he gave a brilliant demonstration of his forecasting principles that put the CO2 industry to shame.
The wasted billions of the "Man Made Climate Change" worshippers in their pursuit of seeing "The Emperors New Clothes" has not delivered anything so far, and neither will it ever deliver anything in the future, apart from requests for even more finance to appease an ever increasing skeptical public that has seen the "Emperor" laid bare.
Article continues below this advert:
The conference, held at the Imperial collage, London, drew the attention of the BBC with Roger Harrabin and Richard Black, but no representatives from Greenpeace or more importantly, no members of the UK Met Office took the bait to see the WORLD NUMBER ONE long range weather forecaster play to many of his supporters.
The fact of the matter is, the Met Office are found wanting when it comes to going beyond a few days with their weather forecasting methods, and no matter how big their computer, its not going to do the job without Piers Corbyn's Solar Weather Forecasting Technique, using HIS formulas and HIS very experienced knowledge of astrophysics.
If you wanted a world leading weather forecasting service, then the combined efforts of Piers Corbyn working alongside the Met Office would certainly be second to none. Alas, the Met Office personnel have their heads planted firmly in the sand or rather CO2, and any attempt to remove them by Piers Corbyn would have to be sanctioned by the IPCC. Realistically, that is very unlikely to happen, and ALL of us are worse off. For Piers to be able to predict the probability and location of a typhoon or major hurricane months in advance MUST save lives in the long term.
This is a taster of what he can do.....Piers gave the following long range weather prediction for the UK, and this has been known for several months, and those of us that are skeptical of listening to anyone giving a long range weather forecast of more than a few days had better take note.
Piers has publicly announced the high probability of a "Sea Storm Surge" off the east coast of the British Isles in mid November, the last time he did that (2007) the Norfolk sea defenses held back the high tide by only four inches. Had this defense been breached, the region would have suffered untold damage.
The story of that particular prediction never made the press but, if the BBC reporters at this conference are true to their word, Piers will undoubtedly be mentioned in dispatches if the "Sea Surge" prediction becomes a reality. No doubt, he will also be mentioned if it fails to materialise.
After a great contribution via Web-Ex video from Joe D'Aleo a Councillor of the American Meteorological Society (AMS), and Dr Kirill Kuzanyan Solar Physicist from Moscow and a message of support from Viscount Christopher Monckton of Brenchley who went on to say
”Congratulations to Piers Corbyn and everyone at WeatherAction on the latest advances in their solar forecasting technique. Who needs a Met Office supercomputer with the carbon footprint of a small town when the behavior of the Sun provides a more efficient and environmentally-acceptable forecasting solution? Now that measurement has definitively established anthropogenic "global warming" to be bunk, the British taxpayer could save a fortune by abolishing the Met Office and all other government departments that credulously believed in the alarmist nonsense peddled by the self-serving IPCC, and switching to WeatherAction instead. Three cheers for private enterprise, and for WeatherAction!” - Monckton of Brenchley
Dr David Bellamy, the renowned naturalist gave a broadside to the stupid activity of the London Science museum (situated next door to the Conference) which has tried to use propaganda to influence the public in an
opinion poll relating to "Man Made Climate Change". He also gave mention to the tree ring fiasco that had supported the discredited "Hockey Stick".
Other speakers included: Hans Schreuder, the Analytic chemist who ridiculed the so called science behind CO2: Prof Philip Hutchinson, Energy Expert, demonstrated the perfect and unused energy source, the SUN : Peter Gill, Expert on various Climate Influence Mechanisms went through the arithmetic that supported how small "Man Made CO2" was.
Sammy Wilson DUP MP for East Antrim and former Environment Minister for The Northern Ireland Assembly rocked the audience with a humorous speech concerning how the Met Office could not produce a five month forecast to predict summer or winter and yet had gone on record to say a 50 year ahead forecast would be a lot easier.
Tweet Article
Post to Facebook
Print Article
You open your article by lamenting the absence of Greenpeace and the Met Office: Would you attend a conference whose very name spells out the intention to ridicule you?
I was heartened to see two representatives of the BBC, an organization which, as a "neutral" would not feel itself to be in the firing line. However, two factors suggest a falling away from complete impartiality at Broadcasting House: the only question (re the origin of the modern CO2 increase)from them was one which either of the absent groups would have asked: and the continuing imbalance of reporting in favour of news articles promoting AGW seems statistically implausible. (Yesterday's SciTech column (Ceefax page 154) was a classic: You just knew that the article "Starfish pump up to cool down" would end with yet another gratuitous ring of the climate change doomsday bell.) I therefore welcomed the undertaking by Roger Harrabin to report on the conference, and look forward to the appearance of a balanced news item (somewhere!).
Going back to my first point though, the challenge is for the debate to be heard by reasonable people and to be seen to be credible. The conference is a major step in that direction.