Our first newspaper advertisement has now been realised, thanks to all the donors for their contributions.
IT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN DONE WITHOUT YOUR FINANCIAL GENEROSITY - THANK YOU!
http://www.ilovemycarbondioxide.com/pdf/GW_advert.jpg
A quarter page in full colour and prominently on page 5. Considering the costs of inserting on page 3 (25% premium) versus the bigger display on page 5 made it clear to go for the bigger display.
With thanks to the Art Dept and Agency Staff at East Anglian Daily Times for their superb effort and patience.
Article continues below this advert:
The second proof is here
http://www.ilovemycarbondioxide.com/pdf/GW_advert_second_proof.pdf and apart from the overlay with the graph this is the correct final version.
A link to the EADT site will be obtained on Monday.
Best regards,
Hans Schreuder
See original posting
COMMENTS PLEASE - CLIMATE CHANGE THE TRUTH Advert proof from Hans Schreuder
Tweet Article
Post to Facebook
Print Article
I am spending all my time on this exposure of climate science fraud. I have stored archives and found ways to contact people. But I still haven't found anyone who will read this and figure out how to get it "out there."
Samizdata (see bottom link) is an awesome site full of intelligent people. On January 10, one of their contributors wrote about Climategate being similar to the Cold War. But the best part was the comments section. The contributors there had some realistic suggestions for getting past the news blackout on this issue. They suggest we concentrate on Pachauri, as it will allow politicians to save face. And that may be one of the single biggest hurdles we have to overcome.
As we speak:
NASA is under scrutiny:
http://climateaudit.org/2010/01/23/nasa-hide-this-after-jim-checks-it/#comment-217428
The CRU is under scrutiny:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100023449/wow-uk-parliamentary-investigation-into-climategate-may-not-be-a-whitewash/
But what politician is going to attack NASA, NOAA, etc. If you look at NASA's site today, they have a brand new explanation (1-21-10) for everyone to read. http://climate.nasa.gov//news/index.cfm?FuseAction=ShowNews&NewsID=248
Gavin Schmidt has smoothed over the arguments raised by KUSI tv.
This is the article I want people to see. The best tactics I've seen are here:
http://www.samizdata.net/blog/archives/2010/01/cold_wars_1.html
Thank you for your attention. If you do not have time for this, can you refer me to someone who might?
Kathryn Ubl
Librarian