Angry pro-green biologist suspected of fraud ejects TV producer from university interview to evade probing questions over hidden data.
Australian biologist, Roslyn Gleadow of Monash University, Melbourne raised eyebrows recently in her much
trumpeted alarmist paper,
'Growth and nutritive value of cassava are reduced when grown in elevated CO2'. Now she deepens suspicions of wrongdoing by storming out of a media interview.
Science of Carbon Dioxide Effects on Plant Growth Re-written?
These new “findings” widely hyped on pro-green news outlets have come under closer scrutiny since discredited Climategate crank, Kevin Trenberth (
see video here) rushed to the authors’ defense. Bizarrely the controversial study totally contradicts the findings of a large body of science that has told us for years that carbon dioxide (CO2) is an essential plant food and adding more of it increases organic growth.
Moreover, it is established practice in agriculture that enclosures using increased CO2 promote crop yields, is good for both agro-business and consumers in that it leads to increased cost efficiency and thus cheaper food prices.
But, as we shall see below, when the Aussie biologist was asked during an interview to explain why her conclusions contradicted the findings of such eminent scientists such as Katsu Imai (1984) and others, she dramatically ended proceedings.
Gleadow’s freakish behavior is set to fuel further speculation that she and the paper’s co-authors, John R. Evans, Stephanie McCaffery and Timothy R. Cavagnaro are complicit in another high-profile eco-fraud.
Angry Green Researcher Refuses to Explain Anomalies
Click source to read FULL report from John O'Sullivan