4 May 2012
To media and contacts:
This is a copy of a letter I sent, 4 May, To Roger Helmer MEP, Sammy Wilson MP and Lord Monckton with copies to various about what is going on with May's weather and to show the need to drive home the fact of the total failure of CO2 delusionist policies it represents.
It was for them sent with a copy of the UK+Ireland May 30day forecast which is one of the most significant months for special weather for decades because of the 'Little Ice Age' type of circulation being expressed as Britain and Ireland and the world get progressively colder as temperatures generally decline in the descent to a new Little-Ice age by 2035. (Forecasts link: http://www.weatheraction.com/wactmember5.asp )
Please circulate information and support any appropriate events or actions.
Thank you,
Piers Corbyn
Founder and Director WeatherAction.com
Article continues below this advert:
Dear Roger, Sammy, Lord Monckton and various Citizens (bcc),
I have added you to our free monitors list (and some are repeats to also get this letter) for you to have a look at this MAY in UK + Ireland but also specifically for this month because of what the warmist Johnny-come-latelies and charlatans are up to and our need to challenge them at every turn.
The usual crew of churlish charlatans unanimously denounced our long range forecast for a supercold May (for central and EAST Britain, rather than West) when it was on the front page of the Express on 19 April, saying it was impossible or very unlikely.
However they are now 'forecasting' the impossible a few days ahead and sometimes references are made to 'experts' having warned of this without giving us the credit - making it look as if some of these charlatans actually said it.
Let us be absolutely clear the number of standard Meteorologists, other 'independents' (but not independent of the Met Office sad failed 'models'!) and weather 'experts', who agreed with our forecast issued mid April was ZERO. Yes ZERO and indeed they also unimously said it would be either 'mild' or not as cold as we forecast. No-one else said anything remotely like our forecast - which is now reality. For example Netweather opined as in this note from RichardW posted onhttp://www.weatheraction.com/displayarticle.asp?a=450&c=5:
On 20 Apr 2012, RichardW wrote: There's a re-run of the cold May story on NetWeather this morning. Their conclusion:
"In summary, whilst longer range forecasting is often fraught with difficulty and always considered lower confidence than shorter range forecasting, we think the likelihood of a significantly colder than average May is very low. "
The battle lines are firmly drawn!
Apart from the fact a condition for quoting WeatherAction forecasts is we be acknowledged and I am frankly disgusted when we are not; on this one the warmists will squirm and lie and squirm and lie again and again and again.
This is the time to checkmate them. The real weather in the real world this month is and will continue to be a TOTAL refutation of their 'climate' models and their 'long' / medium range range standard Met models and a confirmation of our explicit warning that their models will run into serious trouble this month.
We can be absolutely sure the BBC will be top of the squirmers and lairs and will NEVER acknowledge our forecast - just like they never acknowledged we forecast (against 100% of other 'experts') the coldest Dec in 100 years (Dec 2010). And the MetO? They will just ask for another supercomputer to get the wrong answers quicker. This is fraud and theft and they must be stopped.
So, I hope you will be able to help set the record straight wherever possible.
All best and thanks for your continuing support in the fight for accountable science and policies,
Piers Corbyn,
PSs
1. You are welcome to pass on THIS forecast and letter to trusted associates who may help (but not mass mail-outs of the forecast because we have to sell forecasts in order to pay for production of the next ones)
2. Maybe we ought to consider a meeting in the Palace of Westminster on this.
3. If Netweather were honest they would say (suggested additions to their statement to correct the dishonesty:
"Whilst longer range forecasting BY STANDARD METEOROLOGY is often fraught with difficulty and always considered lower confidence than shorter range forecasting, WeatherAction Solar-Lunar based forecasts stand above all others in their detail and have independently proven significant skill whilst all other methods have never shown significant skill in any independent test."
4. We, WeatherAction, could achieve better than the skill of MetOffice 4 day ahead forecasts from up to one year ahead for 1% of the cost of a new MetO supercomputer and it's ongoing support costs.
Tweet Article
Post to Facebook
Print Article
It will be interesting to see what the CET will be this month, is that what you'll be using to assess your forecast?