View Article & Comments

Functional insanity (a willful avoidance of some aspect of objective reality) seems to be the key word now:

http://theendofthemystery.blogspot.com/2012/05/why-climate-debate-is-over-and-why-both.html

Comment edited by harrydhuffman (Twitter) on Wednesday May 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM EDT

"deniers" Rush Limbaugh, George W. Bush, Christopher Monckton, Fox News, The Wall Street Journal.

Interesting juxtaposition; 3 of the 5 have little credence and don't debate but use polemic and vitriol to get a point across. I certainly wouldn't trust Fox News as far as I could throw it but then that would hold true for the more serious news which only differs in that they are more measured in the appearance of bias. Having said that they tend to offer a far broader base of opinion than the likes of the BBC. The WSJ has sank since Murdoch took over and is tarred by that perception, although the warmists will only see this through the lens of which media echo their delusions rather than having a debate.

By this association Monckton is of the same ilk as the others mentioned and is slurred by the 'company he keeps'. Presumably it was easier to tar him this way than on the science as we all know how that would turn out.

Note the broad base of the targets they choose which is a classic media smear, which for anyone astute enough should be ringing alarm bells that the truth is being buried.

In reply we only ever have to do the following;

Exhibit A Michael Mann
Exhibit B James Hansen
Exhibit C Peter Glieck

The words of these three really are in a class of denial of their own. I really don't think, even including Rush, that us 'deniers' have anything to compare to the 'functional insanity' of the three stooges of alarmism.

Comment edited by Craig M (Twitter) on Wednesday May 23, 2012 at 5:41 PM EDT