Articles Tagged "Malcolm Roberts"

To: Senator Christine Milne
cc
All federal parliamentary Greens
All federal MP's, newspaper editors, Friends

Dear Senator Milne:

Attached is a brief summary of Eco Fraud's environmental casualties.

Since May 21, 2009, via Australia Post, facsimile and e-mail I have drawn to your attention overwhelming and growing evidence of UN IPCC fraud. I conclude that your position is either consciously fraudulent or negligently misguided. Assuming for now that your politics is motivated by care rather than your care motivated by your politics, I hope you will care enough to change your policy. It needs to be based on scientific facts and genuine environmental and humanitarian needs.

Malcolm Roberts
BE (Hons), MBA (Chicago)Fellow AICD, MAIM, MAusIMM, MAME (USA), MIMM (UK), Fellow ASQ (USA, Aust)

PDF Attachments: Eco Fraud's environmental casualties: TheEcoFraudPt2.pdf

For Part 1 see Open Letter: To Senator Milne - why do Greens senators divert responsibility onto you? from Malcolm Roberts BE (Hons), MBA (Chicago)

To: Senator Christine Milne
cc All federal parliamentary Greens, All federal MP's, newspaper editors, Friends

Dear Senator Milne:

Your senate Greens colleagues, Scott Ludlam (August 12th, 2009) and Sarah Hanson-Young (no date) advised me by Australia Post that you are responsible for the Greens' climate policy. Although they, like all MP's, remain personally responsible for their every vote in parliament, it is clear you are driving the Greens party's climate agenda.

Please refer to the attached brief Timeline of UNEP and UN IPCC fraud.

This supplements extensive fully referenced documents previously sent you itemising UN IPCC falsities and fraudulent corruption of science and climate.

Contrary to your letter of September 28th, 2009, the UN IPCC has no scientifically measured real world evidence that human production of CO2 caused Earth's latest, modest, cyclic warming that ended around 1998. I please request that you justify your statement and position by advising of one specific piece of scientifically measured real-world evidence proving human production of carbon dioxide caused global warming.

Given overwhelming and growing evidence of UN IPCC fraud sent to you, I conclude your position is either consciously fraudulent or misguided. Assuming for now that your politics is motivated by care rather than your care motivated by your politics, I hope you will care enough to change your policy to base it on scientific facts and true environmental and humanitarian needs.

Malcolm Roberts
BE (Hons), MBA (Chicago) Fellow AICD, MAIM, MAusIMM, MAME (USA), MIMM (UK), Fellow ASQ (USA, Aust)
PDF Attachments:The Eco Fraud - Part 1: A Timeline of international fraud &Climategate 'Inquiry' References

Friends, Editors, MP's, 14 delegates to Copenhagen from Office of PM and Office of PM & Cabinet:

Attached is my gift to you for a happy new year free from fear and guilt. A year of freedom to really care for our natural environment and for people in need.

The attachment condenses thousands of pages of books and journals that I've read during the last two years by eminent climate scientists. My wife Christine and I hope it's of assistance to you. We paid a professional graphic artist to make the document easy and interesting to read.

This explanation of environmental and humanitarian challenges is designed for people with varied technical levels and backgrounds. After reading the first few pages readers can move directly to understanding what the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (UN IPCC) is doing (6 pages, Step 1) and/or understand science's facts on Earth's climate (13 pages, Step 2).

Using the UN IPCC's own published data, the "science" of man-made climate change is scrutinised and found wanting.

"Based on government advertising and campaigns, you may be worried that humans are warming our planet catastrophically. From what I've seen from IPCC data provided by the IPCC itself, the government's position is unfounded."

"The IPCC itself provides information discrediting its own computer models and claims. Although not mentioned in the IPCC's Summary for Policymakers handed to governments and the media, the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report of 2007 (4AR) discloses that climate models could not reproduce the average temperatures observed unless those models included estimates of the impact of human production of 'greenhouse gases'. Even though human production of 'greenhouse gases' is trivial besides Nature's overwhelming production, the IPCC explains the failure of its models by blaming the errors on the tiny human portion (3%) of Earth's annual CO2 production.

This conclusion by the IPCC is based on an implication that the computer models of natural climate were 100% accurate and reliable. But the IPCC report itself advises that the level of scientific understanding of the majority of climate drivers is very poor."

"Thus, the IPCC claims human production of CO2 causes global warming simply because that is its excuse for the error in its models. No logic, no data. Only a political need."

Best regards,

Hans Schreuder

Letter to The Editor & To all Honourable Members of Parliament

No. 1 of a Series - IPCC’s Greenhouse theory has No Legs

In theorising global warming is caused by human production of CO2, the IPCC relies on this theory:
- sun radiates light
- that heats the Earth
- which radiates heat to space.
- CO2 traps some of this heat and radiates it back to Earth
- which heats the Earth some more, which radiates even more heat, which CO2 traps... and so on.

In this IPCC "new science", a cooler body (atmospheric CO2) heats a warmer body (Earth). This contravenes the Laws of Nature.