Articles Tagged "Via Email"
Sorted by: Date Posted
Friday, August 13th 2010, 10:10 AM EDT
I had this email sent in, and it adds a little more to the "SatelliteGate story
Major Update about the NOAA 16 Satellite and when problems with it were known see end of the article
Well according to NOAA at least part of Lake Michigan reached that temperature, while other parts had temperatures in excess of 100°, 200°, 300° and 400° F. I saw this a couple of days ago and at first thought it was a hoax being perputrated to try and discredit skeptics, and I still had a nagging suspicion that was the case when I saw the data myself from the Michigan State University's CoastWatch archives (CoastWatch is a co-operative effort between NOAA and MSU). Then yesterday I saw something about all the data for the NOAA-16 Satellite going bye bye (don't remember where exactly)
Well today those two little facts got tied together with a nice little bow and a big attempt by NOAA to first cover up and then whitewash at the minimum gross negligence by the agency.
First to get things in perspective you should read the article from 9 Aug on the website "Climate Change Fraud" (CCF) where the story about the broiling waters of Lake Michigan is found:
Thursday, May 6th 2010, 2:17 AM EDT
Legislation and regulation aimed at controlling greenhouse gas emissions are predicated on the belief that science definitively shows that man's greenhouse gas emissions are causing the Earth's temperature to rise, with serious deleterious effects.
What if the cause-and-effect relationships between GHGs and temperature are greatly overstated? What if the data used to measure temperature change and its effects are of poor quality? What if we don't adequately understand important climatic systems (such as clouds or oceans) to simulate them accurately in the computer models used to predict climatic change? What if the stated positions of key scientific societies are under assault by the member rank and file? What if the state of empirical knowledge points to only a small human effect on climate? What if the best scientific information we have does not justify the economic costs associated with proposed legislation and regulation?
The answers to these questions directly impact the legislative and regulatory debates underway in the Congress and the Obama Administration.
On May 14, Dr. William Happer and Dr. Roger Cohen will review key features of climate science.
Click PDF file to see Invitation
Thursday, April 22nd 2010, 5:43 PM EDT
Just thought you would enjoy this shareholder's proposal to be voted on at the May 13th meeting of the Ford Motor Company.
Click PDF file to read Ford Shareholder's Proposal
Tuesday, April 6th 2010, 7:30 AM EDT
The attached pdf is my last entry and if you have any chance of giving that some publicity I would be most appreciative.
Having heard all sides of all of the arguments, it is clear that nobody has a clue about how our atmosphere works. You would not believe the nonsensical information that has been thrown into the various arguments.
Ad hominem attacks of the severest nature by fellow so-called skeptics have proven to be as disgraceful as similar attacks by alarmists.
Also, it appears that nobody understands the difference between cause and effect anymore, routinely switching them over.
Best of luck with the fight against the insanity that has taken over the world of politics as well as academia.
Thanks also for your input over the years.
Download PDF file to see last posting from Hans
Thursday, March 25th 2010, 6:44 AM EDT
Click for bigger image
I've noticed that BOM uses different stations for measuring annual
mean temperature then what stations they use for daily and monthly
There seems to be a few more used for the annual stations then daily.
The thing that has my curiosity is that, would placing greater stations in areas of greater warming effect the rate of graphed
I've put it all into one image with each map layered over each other and noticed an imbalance.
Not to mention a station missing in the only place to have a negative trend.
Here's the original links from BOM.
Monday, March 22nd 2010, 7:23 AM EDT
You may have heard of Peter Spencer, the desperate Australian farmer who went on a hunger strike to draw attention to the fact that government bans on clearing vegetation had stolen his assets and destroyed his business. Peter is just one of many Australian farm families reduced to desperation and even suicide by seizure or sterilisation of their land to satisfy the voracious green god.
The most massive injustice occurred a couple of years ago, when, as a sacrifice to the Kyoto god, the federal government conspired with state governments to ban vegetation clearing on all property, even freehold. This was done in an underhand way to allow the government to seize carbon credits from landowners without paying compensation.
Many well meaning people, while not happy with the tactics and the refusal to pay compensation for property seized or devalued, think that there will be some environmental or climate benefits to come from all this.
Generally there are none.
Saturday, March 20th 2010, 9:38 AM EDT
Below is the original email sent to NOAA and below that is their response to that email. (Statements in BOLD are my additions for this email in an attempt to further help you delineate the sequence of events. Please let me know if I have somewhat confused you about the events……
Here’s the original email sent to NOAA and also blind copied to you:
Subject: Data Quality issues
Please find two documents attached to this email.
The files contain Upper Air sounding data for Station 70273 PANC
File "uwyo.txt" data was obtained from
Saturday, March 20th 2010, 8:54 AM EDT
I just tried to find University of East Anglia researcher Keith Briffa on Wikipedia, and he was no where to be found! The following cached page was available through Yahoo: (withdrawn/not found)
It sugests that he must have been removed because of his association with ClimateGate. Apparently Wikipedia does not want to make it easy to research the principle players in this scandal and learn the details of their involvement.
It is a scandal in itself when a supposedly neutral reference is so deliberately obstructive and biased.
Gordon J. Fulks, PhD
Corbett, Oregon USA
Updated in comments section by Luboš Motl
Friday, February 12th 2010, 5:11 PM EST
Here's a link for your bloggers to keep tabs on the CRU inquiry as it goes along.
As they are only looking at procedures at CRU it's really the
UEA report into the 'science' that we all want to see.
Tuesday, January 12th 2010, 4:50 AM EST
This report was sent to me by a colleague. It appears too good not to pass along. Bill Gray
The Arctic ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the Commerce Department yesterday from Consul Ifft, at Bergen, Norway. Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers, he declared, all point to a radical change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic zone. Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met with as far north as 81 degrees 29 minutes. Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very warm. Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared. Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts, which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds.
I'm sorry, I neglected to mention that this report was from November 2, 1922 as reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post
212 articles foundshowing page 1 of 22« previous 1 2 3 4
. . . 21 22 next »