Articles Tagged "Hans Schreuder"

Being a simple guy I can only do simple tests..

Make no error that I stand in awe of all of you who can make complex calculations. This is my contribution to empirical evidence about the absolute non-existent atmospheric effect "making the earth warmer than it would otherwise be".

Where do the climate clowns get the energy from to "force" carbon dioxide to make the air warmer?! Not even by 0.00001°C is possible, based on known physics.

SIMPLE SIMON ASKS: WHERE IS THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT IN OPEN AIR?

Since the climate liars cannot make their case on the basis of the known science, taking it into a court of law with a passionate appeal to emotion in order to impose restrictions on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions has long been a Green goal.

The claim that CO2 causes “climate change” which is the new spin on “global warming” is utterly false, but it may be argued if the Iowa Supreme Court takes the case.

When a similar case was argued before the U.S. Supreme Court, the esteemed justices ruled that CO2 was a “pollutant” under the Clean Air Act and not the second most vital atmospheric gas after oxygen, the “food” for all vegetation on Earth.

The Greens have understandably concluded they can get what they want, restrictions on all energy use, in the courts of justice if not in the court of public opinion.

After studying and analysing climate related issues over the past seven years, here is my final analysis, based on the best scientific practice of test, test and then test again - in real life that is, with empirical data, not via elaborate computer code run through models of our earth’s situation.

1. Our earth revolves around a star, our Sun, which nullifies the premise that what goes for a star goes for our earth - there is a fundamental difference between a self-illuminating body and one being illuminated. Our earth is made up of two fundamentally opposite hemispheres that can not be averaged to produce a sphere that is bathed in a luke-warm sun, as per the unrealistic K&T energy budget on which so much hype is based. [1, 2] For those wanting a formula for that: 12h Day + 12h Night 24h Twilight.

2. Carbon dioxide is not a warming gas at all, it is a cooling gas but when you trap such a gas in a container, the container will warm up and do the trapping of the heat, radiated at it off the so-called greenhouse gas, which is desperate to get rid of the heat that has been forced upon it from outside the bottle. If the gas did trap the heat, how can the bottle get warm? Open the bottle and the gas will cool down almost instantly whilst the container will take its time to reach ambient temperature.

In our open-to-space atmosphere, the excellent radiating properties of all so-called greenhouse gases serve to cool the atmosphere, never to warm it. Any and all gases in our atmosphere cool the planet, either by absorbing solar radiation on its way to the surface or by taking energy away from the surface but at no stage can any gas add energy. In reality, it is the oxygen and nitrogen that act as “greenhouse gases” – they retain heat much longer than the gases now labeled such.

After a night of mild grass frost (minus 3°C) this picture, taken at 16h48 and just before sunset, shows that despite a whole day of sunshine (but none directly onto this patch of land) the frost does not melt as there is no heat from the atmosphere beaming down to earth!

As per previous tests, the ground directly below the frost is above zero °C and the air was also above zero °C, yet the ice remains.

And whilst the ice formed, it dumped 80 calories per gram into the atmosphere ....so much for "radiative forcing", "back-radiation" and the "greenhouse effect".

Best regards,

Hans

TUC Climate Change Policy Link

To the TUC Leaders (via the TUC Information Service),

Following on from your Information Service's response to my web enquiry (see below) I would appreciate some enlightenment from the TUC as to why they have, without question, taken the government's position on climate change to heart.

For as far as I understand the matter, the TUC was formed to look after the workers and to fight any and all government schemes that would undermine the well-being of the workers.

From your unequivocal alignment with government policy that

Climate change resulting from carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gas emissions poses the greatest threat to our existence on this planet. To contain that threat, the world needs to cut emissions by about half by 2050 and to start reducing emissions now.

you appear unaware of two issues:

1. There has never been any proof positive that human activities have influenced the climate and

2. Reducing "emissions" [of carbon dioxide] will lead to wholesale job losses and widespread poverty.

Please stop for one moment and read the selected excerpts below, then please read this seven-page essay (Copernicus Meets the Greenhouse Effect by Joseph E. Postma) then ask me to visit your offices for a 30-minute presentation on the truth about climate change and what drives it.

Vostok, Antarctica Ice Core Data

In Al Gore’s presentation of his "Inconvenient Truth" documentary, he conveniently separated the Vostok Ice core temperature and CO2 graphs so you could not see which came first, a warming spike or a CO2 spike. He said that a CO2 spike came first but alas, it was the just the opposite as shown in the Vostok Ice Core graph above.

When both lines are combined on one graph, suitably enlarged and viewed in the correct direction from left to right, it is clearly seen that a warming spike always comes first (blue line) followed by a CO2 increase (red line) some 800 years later.

This is a rebuttal based on Physics Trumps Right-Wing Ideology written by Mr. Puckerclust. Puckerclust begins his post thusly:

"Global warming deniers know as much about climate science as they do about brain surgery. Would you let them tell your doctor what to do about that tumor?

"Why do I–a professional physicist and lifetime member of the American Physical Society–accept the reality of human-caused global warming? Because I accept the following top-ten list of physics facts, which have never been disputed in the scientific literature. This is also why the American Physical Society of 47,000 physicists says "The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring"."

Before we set the record straight about those ten supposed physics facts, let’s also set the record straight on some preliminary information that Mr Puckerclust would like us to believe.

Friends,

I can proudly announce that Amazon is now selling the ebook version of the groundbreaking climate science publication, ‘Slaying the Sky Dragon: Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory.’

Our UK publishers, St Matthews Publishing and our US publisher Stairway Press will have their respective paperback versions for sale early in December.

Never before have so many of the world’s leading experts, skeptical of the global warming fraud, come together in one united front to slay that mythical beast. This publication is the new benchmark; here a line is drawn and a battle fought for our future and our children’s future.

‘Slaying the Sky Dragon’ is the world’s first and only full volume publication that expertly debunks the established theory of man-made global warming- the so-called ‘greenhouse gas effect.’ Prepare to be astounded. The hardest job for me has been keeping the facts we reveal under wraps for so long!

John O'Sullivan

*** PROMOTIONAL MESSAGE***

I do not make this prediction lightly: so utterly irrefutable and powerful is its message that 'Slaying the Sky Dragon’ will become the biggest selling science book since Stephen Hawking’s ‘Brief History of Time.’

One year after Climategate the greenhouse gas theory, the absolute cornerstone of IPCC ‘science,’ is torn to shreds. In an unprecedented achievement 24 international experts (over 2 volumes) have worked tirelessly to compose the definitive masterpiece of skeptical science.

Retired Ipswich-based scientist Hans Schreuder will visit the Houses of Parliament in London tomorrow, 27 October 2010 to take part in a scientific gathering in Committee Room 16 at 14h00 (see attached invitation) to explain to MPs and other interested parties that the drive to reduce the country's emissions of harmless carbon dioxide via taxpayer's funded multi-billion Pound subsidies of foreign-built wind farms and other so-called green energies is misdirected and a complete waste of taxpayer's money.

It is critical to emerge from the guilt-ridden decades of false climate alarm. Mr Schreuder will call for an end to unfounded, soul-destroying fear and guilt that has been peddled by agenda-motivated climate alarmists.

Economic wealth is the key to protecting the environment, not fear-mongering and making us feel bad about being human development.

The environment's main destroyer is ignorance and we need restore scientific integrity at the earliest possible opportunity.

Despite world-wide research over the past 20 years, having cost the taxpayer an estimated 80 billion US dollars, there is still not one single shred of actual evidence that links carbon dioxide to any of the many quoted climate events. To scientists like Mr Schreuder this is no surprise as such evidence does not exist and will therefore never be found.

By Hans Schreuder, 4 October 2010

www.ilovemycarbondioxide.com

There is an ongoing and concerted effort [1] by a well-funded group of eco-warrior style partners [2] to reduce the emissions of so-called “greenhouse gases” for the sole purpose of reducing the impact of human developments on the “disruption of our climate”.

As a scientist with no faculty to support or a desk to defend, I am free from the shackles of academia that prevent the truth from surfacing. [3]

So instead of aiming for a 10% reduction of “greenhouse gas emissions” some time before the end of this year, 2010, I propose to do the exact opposite and I’ll explain why.

First and foremost, there is not one single shred of evidence that so-called “greenhouse gases” do what they are alleged to do: warm the earth by either trapping or re-radiating some energy back to earth. [4]

Secondly, there is also no evidence that the increased level of atmospheric carbon dioxide is caused exclusively by the emissions from human developments. The only evidence that does exist quantifies the human emissions as no more than about 5% of all the atmospheric carbon dioxide. [5]