Sunday, June 7th 2009, 2:21 PM EDT
This week the government-media complex presented its greatest Orwellian effort so far in public mind control on the climate issue. The ABC two-hour science fiction horror story, EARTH 2100, was a melodramatic, hyperbolic example of mental water boarding. The story line provides a century of systemic human caused events building to the final crescendo of total Apocalypse. All the result of not supporting the Waxman-Markey Bill, also know as the ‘Cap and Trade Act’ by today’s ignorant masses.
As with all fiction, the writer controls the scenes, the characters and the plot line for the benefit of the audience. The villain in this docudrama is carbon dioxide, capable of planetary destruction with just a few parts per million change in the atmosphere. There is a rapidly building consensus among the public and the scientifically community which is rejecting this sophomoric explanation of climate change.
The government-media complex position on this issue is very similar to that of a boisterous parent at a junior high band concert. Unable to hear anything but their own third row violinist, they loudly demand consensus on the pivotal role of their player. Others may believe that more credit goes to the orchestra director and the soloists.
Climate change has not been a science driven investigation for truth, but rather a government-industry driven vehicle to create a new revenue stream. Science is but a handmaiden to this master. A false premise can only be supported but cherry picked data and limited debate. This has been the IPCC and AGW approach to enact this draconian behavior control mechanism.
Science has succeeded in solving a myriad of mysteries by following a strict method of investigation. First is to establish all relevant parameters and then determine the relative impact of all those various factors. Some factors are primary drivers, able to over-ride all other inputs. Secondary parameters can have varying influence over time. Some factors are causative and some only reactive. Some factors can only buffer or damper the actions of others.
The Earth’s weather is indeed a symphony and AGW is indeed a third row violin. The ClimateRealist.com website is hosting an online, worldwide debate and peer review. This author has presented a series of articles which establish the predicate for a wide range of possible environmental influences. To avoid redundancy this series of articles should be studied in chronological order along with supporting denier data provided by other authors posted there.
Geo-nuclear climate change theory proposes that the parameters for climate change include internal Earth nuclear reactions, geologic, biologic, atmospheric, solar and galactic forces in a grand universal concert. The galaxy is the maestro with Uranium as the star piccolo soloist and geology is the percussion section loaded with kettledrums and cymbals.
Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels had nothing to do with the 1883 explosion of Krakatoa, which expelled five cubic miles of rock and ash. This ash blocked out the sun and reduced Earth temperatures by two degrees Fahrenheit and took five years to recover. This minor cymbal bang was noting compared to the super volcano event at Yellowstone, which blew 240 cubic miles of rock and a portion of the atmosphere into space.
Evidence suggests that 700 million years ago, during the Neoproterozoic Era, the Earth was covered with thick ice from both poles to within 15 degrees latitude of the equator. Playfully called ‘Popsicle Planet’ or ‘Snowball Earth’, these phenomena occurred at least four times and lasted up to 10 million years each time. When these events ended atmospheric CO2 levels soared to 350 times present levels. The Snowball Earth hypothesis wrongly assumed that atmospheric CO2 reductions and expansions were the cause of this greenhouse-icehouse climate shift.
Geo-nuclear theory proposes that there is a cosmic force capable of causing fluctuation in solar activity, geo-magnetism and Earth magna nuclear reactions. When this tiniest player in this great symphony makes an acoustic solo the planet cools in the hushed sounds and reduced nuclear reactions. When the maestro directs the piccolo soloist to the microphone the hall resonates with sound. When the galaxy directs increases in geo-nuclear reactions there is an increase in volcanism, causing increases in planet heat and atmospheric CO2. However, the effect is not the cause.
What ClimateRealist.com and its authors are doing is to simply trying to provide the widest array of possible environmental factors, which could influence this most important of all modern debates. Deniers face explaining a complicated problem to a public with limited technical background. Since geo-nuclear climate theory covers so may branches of science, from nuclear particle physics to galactic radiation it is possible to have inadvertent errors, omissions and differences of semantics.
“There is no such thing as a greenhouse gas”, is an example of semantics. Heat transfer is based on the inherent properties of materials and in general varies with density. The best insulator is a vacuum, gases insulate better than liquids, which are better than solids. When heated all unrestrained gases will rise up and release their captured heat in the upper atmosphere. Insulation and multi-pane glass restrict heat flow by restricting the air movement in the captured space.
Unrestrained air molecules will always rise to atmospheric equilibrium and release the stored energy. Even being 50% denser than standard air, heated CO2 will still rise and release. As mentioned in previous post, water vapor adds change of phase heat transfer to its energy transfer ability. Melting, evaporating, condensing and refreezing allow water vapor to remove enormous amounts of heat from the Earth’s surface. We can therefore argue about even the definition of Greenhouse Gas. Consensus comes at the end of debate when all facts can be confirmed, all doubts erased.
We have all assembled in the great hall of knowledge to be enlightened and entertained. We are not well served by the obnoxious rantings from the parent of one third row violinist. The two hour propaganda piece by ABC demands an equal time response. The media needs to take a break from the voyeuristic reality programming that has become their daily fare and provide a more balanced analysis of this issue. And, please stop the shameless protoselizing for this intellectually defective cult movement.
Joseph A Olson, PE