What wasn’t generally realized before climategate, and what is barely visible below the radar, is the way corruption has been overtaking science in general. I have a large web site on the state of science. I use the following introductory statement (It puts the climate change scam into the perspective of its context in science).
Science Deteriorated into Corruption Due to Lack of Accountability to the Public.
People tend to assume science is impeccable, but it has become extremely corrupt because of very little accountability to the public. The corruption of science used to be in the background where it could be ignored. Now the corruption prevails, while real scientists are marginalized or shoved out.
The significance of scientific fraud is overtaking military force in bankrupting society and creating its problems. Fake green based on carbon dioxide fraud is destroying economies, destroying the environment and wasting resources on an unlimited scale. Unlike old-fashioned environmentalism, there are no improved standards or benefits. All is being sacrificed to combat a fictitious plague contrived through scientific fraud. Cancun Article
Science is one of the most provable subjects, because its purpose is to prove. But its lack of accountability to the public results in extreme corruption. An example of scientific fraud in biology is a protein called a prion said to be the causative agent for a series of complex diseases called Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies. The prion protein has no genetic material for controlling the complexity or evolution of the diseases. Yet the diseases have a large number of variants including Scrapies in sheep, Mad Cow Disease in cattle, Wasting Disease in deer and elk and Creutzfeld-Jacob Disease in humans. These variants constantly evolve, as Mad Cow disease is said to have jumped species from cattle to humans. The real cause is obviously a virus or nanobacterium.
The first major corruption to be imposed onto science was relativity. It has no relationship to the rest of physics or the laws of nature. It’s nothing more than a mathematical contrivance. The only counter-argument is that relativity is proven correct every day. The primary proof is that Einstein predicted light would bend around large objects in space; and sure enough, it does. Predicting is carnival theatrics, not science. The real reason why light bends around stars and galaxies is not because of relativity but due to variable density of mass in their quasi atmospheres. Light bends when going through variable density matter.
Is this point too argumentative? Consider the claim that nothing can move faster than the speed of light—supposedly a law of relativity. The conclusion is based on nothing but a three component equation which has no logical reason to exist. The equation says the momentum of an object equals the inverse of the square root of one minus V squared over C squared. The quantity V can never exceed the quantity of C, because doing so would create the square root of a negative quantity—an impossibility. When the velocity of light is plugged in for C squared, the V (velocity of anything) can never exceed the velocity of light.
Where in that equation is the measurement, evidence or logic? There is none. It’s nothing but a contrived equation with no relationship to anything. It would be just as valid to plug in the number 55 for C instead of the velocity of light; and the equation would then say nothing can go faster than 55 miles per hour. All physicists did was create the simplest possible equation where one number (V) cannot get large than another number (C) and arbitrarily used the velocity of light for C.
Since relativity has no relationship to anything in nature, it has no significance other than a test of standards in physics. It forces all physicists to accept fraud or be shoved out. So a physicist is someone who has decided to accept fraud as a condition for employment. How reliable are such physicists in telling society that global warming will kill the kids and pets unless carbon dioxide is removed from the air?
All biology is on the verge of becoming extinct due to a shortage of carbon dioxide in the air which is necessary for photosynthesis. The CO2 level is extremely low in the atmosphere, because oceans remove it and convert it into calcium carbonate and limestone. There was five times as much CO2 in the air during dinosaur years, and twenty times as much before that. Greenhouse operators often add three times as much to the air to improve plant growth. Humans are slightly correcting the problem by putting more CO2 in the air, though most of the increase is due to warming oceans releasing more, as shown by a small blip when an El Nino heats the Pacific Ocean.
Greenhouse gasses don’t have the slightest ability to create global warming, because the earth is cooled by radiation which goes around them rather than through them. About half of the wavelengths go around them. It doesn’t matter how much goes around or how much is blocked, because the planet just cools until the temperature is right to match the rate of energy escaping with the rate of energy coming from the sun. The only two factors involved (Geothermal and oceans add a trace of complexity.) are rate of energy coming from the sun and the temperature which releases that amount of energy into space. Humans cannot influence either one. (This explanation is a description rather than a proof. Nothing is provable on the subject except the falseness of the claims of alarmists. The burden of proof is on them, not their critics.)
A back-up fraud—in case the global warming fraud collapses, as it is doing—is the claim that alkaline oceans, at about pH 8.1, are becoming too acidic for the shells of marine life, because oceans absorb some of the CO2 humans produce. Any pH over 7.0 is alkaline, not acidic. But physicists/climatologists/co-conspirators claim that the calcium carbonate in sea shells can dissolve at a pH in that area. The overwhelming fraud is that sea shells are not made of calcium carbonate alone; they are made of complexities containing calcium oxide, magnesium, proteins, etc. Sea shells are living tissue, just like teeth are. They are designed to tolerate major challenges in their environment. And sea shells are not produced through the precipitation of calcium carbonate, as frauds claim. They are produced through enzyme controlled physiology. There is no precipitation reaction in the integrated biochemistry of living organisms. Yet a fraudulent precipitation reaction is supposedly destroying sea life.
Physicists show their reliability with the Stephan-Boltzmann Constant (SBC). It states how much radiation is released by any matter at any temperature. Supposedly, the constant is the same for all matter—solids, liquids and gasses—which is absurd, because gasses have a lot more surface area to emit from than solids or liquids do.
The SBC says that the 235 watts per square meter which the sun sends to the earth will be emitted from the earth at a temperature of -19°C. That temperature is found at about five kilometers of height in the atmosphere. So physicists claim the earth is cooled from that location in the atmosphere. What keeps radiation from leaving at four kilometers of height, which is warmer, or three kilometers? Nothing does. The continuous gradient of temperatures in the atmosphere shows that radiation leaves at all locations. Physicists expect people to accept the most preposterous absurdity just because they say so based on an interpretation of an equation. That standard of accepting any fraud when authority demands it is taught and enforced through relativity.
Another extremely obvious and arrogant fraud related to global warming is a fudge factor for supposedly determining how much heating of the globe an increase in carbon dioxide will produce. It should be obvious that there are an infinite number of variables which climatologists cannot evaluate. Yet they claim that another three component equation will produce the number. On top of that, they claim they can convert the heat into temperature by multiplying by 0.75. Temperature does not have a simple relationship to heat.
The fudge factor is this: 5.35 ln C/Co. It says the increase in carbon dioxide, as the ratio of C-now to C-originally, can be multiplied by a constant (5.35) to get heat increase, while the natural log of the ratio is used to make the line curved instead of straight. This constant results in a 3°C global, average temperature increase upon doubling the carbon dioxide in the air (where the ratio of C/Co is two), which was the desired result in 1988. Since then, the 3°C increase became non-credible, because temperatures were not rising that fast. So the end result was changed to 1.2°C. To get that result, the constant needs to be 2.31 instead of 5.35. A few months ago, the often repeated claim changed to 1°C, which would require a constant of 1.92. Then it was reduced 15% to account for overlap with water vapor. They start at the end point and reverse-engineer the equation, which is how fudge factors work.
Nothing is more obvious of a contrivance than the big bang theory. Physicists first claimed that the universe was about 15 billion years old (now 13.7), because light travels about 15 billion years to get from the farthest observed galaxies to earth. They forgot to account for the time it takes galaxies to get where they are. Even if the mass in galaxies moved at the speed of light, the universe would need to be 30 billion years old for the matter to get out there and the light to get back (as if the earth were in the center of the universe). Physicists cannot change their claim for the age of the universe, because if they were that wrong on such a simple point, they could be wrong on anything. There is no such thing as authority being wrong in science. So after decades of claiming the universe is 15 billion years old, physicists decided that galaxies moved to their present location in fractions of a second before the laws of physics began. (If that isn't God's work, what is?) So physicists supposedly know what happened before there were laws of physics.
Climate Alarmists Push Forced Relocation At Cancun Summit. By Paul
Doomed Planet: Sceptics in Wonderland. By Christopher Essex.
Gary Novak: mushroom physiologist, evolution biologist, independent scientist.